Teams

Jakubik

2025 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 5.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-18vs McCannWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmelia Lawson / Ekaterina Potapova vs Shannon Comolli / Eve Helmer6-2, 6-0
2025-05-17vs McCannWon 10
W#2 DoublesEkaterina Potapova / Amelia Lawson vs Erika Trost / Malini Sekhar6-1, 6-2
2025-05-10vs McCannSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Taubenslag / Ekaterina Potapova vs Cecile Hult / Shelagh Meehan6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristen Harsha / Michele Davis vs Shannon Comolli / Heather Herman0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-03vs McCannWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Heather Herman6-3, 6-0
2025-04-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-12vs McCannSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEkaterina Potapova / Amelia Lawson vs Eve Helmer / Angel Batkins6-2, 5-5
L#2 DoublesChristen Harsha / Ye Hu vs Andrea Rice / Delphine Owen0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Ekaterina Potapova
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.60
Casey Burdette
published 5
4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.54
Kendall Heitzner
published
4.46
Shannon Young
published
4.28
Ye Hu
published
4.14
Michele Davis
published
Karen Taubenslag
published
Tara Jakubik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Burdette + Kendall Heitzner044 matchesnot enough data
Ye Hu + Tara Jakubik213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ekaterina Potapova
121W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Casey Burdette
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.60
5
Christen Harsha
480W–135L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
Kendall Heitzner
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.54
Shannon Young
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.46
Ye Hu
31W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Michele Davis
28W–24L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Karen Taubenslag
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.