Teams

SGV Shadow's Aces-Kanemoto-Arroyo High/SU4

2025 Adult Division - 40& Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesHao Truong / Daniel Kanemoto vs Mark Stone / Matthew Huang6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJohn Proulx / Hugh Allen vs Chandrasekar Chinnathambi / Tom Le7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJudd Tongprajiad / Yim Tse vs Ronald Legaspi / Ruben Ron6-0, 7-6
W#1 DoublesHao Truong / Daniel Kanemoto vs Derek Moard / Rafael Molina6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAndrew Yao vs Paul Nakashima6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Proulx / Jay Ho vs Elik Alvarez / Andy Tromans6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Spencer / Thomas Browne vs Adam Acosta / Luis Martinez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Kevin Thoeng
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Jeremy Tuite
published
3.94
Kenneth Park
published
3.87
Daniel Kanemoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Judd Tongprajiad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Thomas Browne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
William Ko
published
3.79
Joseph Widman
published
Andrew Yao
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Hugh Allen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Hao Truong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Steve Oetomo
published
Jay Ho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jefferson Law
published
John Proulx
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shao Chen
published
Todd Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Yim Tse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Proulx + Daniel Kanemoto314 matchesnot enough data
Hao Truong + Daniel Kanemoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kevin Thoeng
116W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
4.13
Jeremy Tuite
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
Kenneth Park
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Daniel Kanemoto
23W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Judd Tongprajiad
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
Thomas Browne
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
William Ko
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Joseph Widman
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Andrew Yao
19W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Hugh Allen
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Hao Truong
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Steve Oetomo
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
Jay Ho
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jefferson Law
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Proulx
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shao Chen
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Spencer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Yim Tse
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.