Teams

Shaddock/LR/Reb

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-14vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Cliff / Brooke Smith vs Mary Thalheimer / Abby Barr6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnna Morshedi / Erika Johnson vs Lacey Watts / Stuart Davis6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAshley Burch / Sara Koger vs Kelli Rawn / Mary Claire McLaurin6-0, 6-2
2025-08-05vs Webster/Conway/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Gorman / Erika Johnson vs Katelyn Lazenby / Diana Pearson Martin4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaeve Shaddock / Karen Shepherd vs Molly Scott / Courtney Klotz6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaire Althoff / Emily Smith vs Amy Webster / Joyce Adame6-3, 7-5
2025-08-03vs DGarretson/NLR/BPWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Cliff / Brooke Smith vs Flora Lucia De La Garza Bayon / Meagan Wood6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Corbin / Karen Shepherd vs Laura Feng / Patricia Savary1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Ann Lipin / Emily Smith vs Sara Jennings / Jessica Buchman7-5, 4-1
2025-07-30vs Johnson/Shaver/LR/RebWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Gorman / Brooke Smith vs Susan Gammill / Sheri Green6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Corbin / Karen Shepherd vs Anita Mason / Elly Rumbach3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSara Koger / Mary Ann Lipin vs Micah Shaver / Ilana Shaver6-4, 6-1
2025-07-15vs Jedlicka/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Cliff / Natalie Gorman vs Tiffani Jedlicka / Abby Barr6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Morshedi / Karen Shepherd vs Elizabeth Chandler / Molly Morrison6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClaire Althoff / Ashley Burch vs Mary Claire McLaurin / Cristie Hughes6-2, 6-0
2025-07-02vs Miller/Law/LR/PVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrooke Smith / Erika Johnson vs Christine Castillo / Sarah Declerk6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAshley Burch / Claire Althoff vs Karrie Miller / Keelen Verser3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Ashley Cliff
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.43
Brooke Smith
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.41
Ashley Burch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.37
Natalie Gorman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Anna Morshedi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Erika Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Karen Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Claire Althoff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Sara Koger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Corbin
published
Maeve Shaddock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Ann Lipin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Gorman + Ashley Cliff224 matchesnot enough data
Brooke Smith + Natalie Gorman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Cliff
50W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
4
Brooke Smith
52W–22L career · 13 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.43
3
Ashley Burch
19W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Natalie Gorman
34W–28L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Anna Morshedi
41W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Erika Johnson
44W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Karen Shepherd
60W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Claire Althoff
15W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Sara Koger
24W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Jennifer Corbin
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maeve Shaddock
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ann Lipin
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.