Teams

Fall Win 6.0 MTC SalianiGreen W65F

2022 FALL Adult 65 & Over · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-01-13vs 6.0 STRC Handler W65FWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Soffa / Terri Loney vs Patricia Aranzaens / Karen Gantt6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudith Klingler / Corey Hart vs Darlene Coppola / Karen Mcclellan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudy Bergendahl / Linda Saliani vs Diana Handler / Lynne Claybaugh6-0, 6-3
2021-12-16vs 6.0 ISP Howell W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hanusa / Judith Klingler vs Sanya Hunsucker / Rachel Speliopoulos2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElayne Pilar / Judy Bergendahl vs Meg Howell / Diane James6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Meyer / Susan Soffa vs Joy Smarr / Kathy Zeiders6-0, 7-6
2021-12-09vs 6.0 STRC Handler W65FWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Hanusa / Judy Bergendahl vs Darlene Coppola / Patricia Aranzaens6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElayne Pilar / Debra Kangas vs Mitsie Sagness / Karen Gantt7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Klingler / Corey Hart vs Sharon Hofeditz / Susan Welsh6-3, 6-4
2021-11-18vs 6.0 ISP Howell W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hanusa / Kathy Green vs Kathy Zeiders / SuLan Peebles4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKim Groudan / Corey Hart vs Sanya Hunsucker / Rachel Speliopoulos6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudith Klingler / Terri Loney vs Joy Smarr / Rita Trent7-5, 6-3
2021-11-11vs 6.0 STRC Handler W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Kangas / Linda Saliani vs Karen Gantt / Mitsie Sagness2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Green / Elayne Pilar vs Darlene Coppola / Susan Welsh7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudy Bergendahl / Kim Groudan vs Diana Handler / Sharon Hofeditz6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-28vs 6.0 ISP Howell W65FWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Hanusa / Patricia Meyer vs Sanya Hunsucker / Jamie Alford6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Green / Debra Kangas vs Joy Smarr / Kathy Zeiders5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKim Groudan / Corey Hart vs Meg Howell / Rita Trent6-2, 6-2
2021-10-21vs 6.0 STRC Handler W65FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBetsy Hanusa / Linda Saliani vs Karen Gantt / Mitsie Sagness4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElayne Pilar / Patricia Meyer vs Margaret Waddell / Diana Handler6-1, 6-1
2021-10-07vs 6.0 ISP Howell W65FWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Green / Elayne Pilar vs Cheryl Merklin / Sanya Hunsucker1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Groudan / Judy Bergendahl vs Joy Smarr / Kathy Zeiders6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatricia Meyer / Linda Saliani vs SuLan Peebles / Linda Hennessey7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0 Adult 65 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fall Win 6.0 MTC SalianiGreen W65F7118616188
26.0 ISP Howell W65F35111331246
36.0 STRC Handler W65F2671735253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Betsy Hanusa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Corey Hart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.81
Debra Kangas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Elayne Pilar
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Judith Klingler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Judy Bergendahl
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Kathy Green
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Groudan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Saliani
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patricia Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Soffa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Terri Loney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Green + Elayne Pilar11555% gamesnot enough data
Kim Groudan + Judy Bergendahl6853% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Meyer + Betsy Hanusa9355% gamesnot enough data
Debra Kangas + Linda Saliani6352% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Meyer + Elayne Pilar8158% gamesnot enough data
Terri Loney + Susan Soffa5258% gamesnot enough data
Corey Hart + Judith Klingler5266% gamesnot enough data
Elayne Pilar + Judy Bergendahl4352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betsy Hanusa
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Corey Hart
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Debra Kangas
101W–106L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Elayne Pilar
43W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
Judith Klingler
15W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Judy Bergendahl
37W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Green
30W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Groudan
19W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Saliani
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Meyer
30W–14L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Soffa
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Terri Loney
29W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.