Teams

Scott/Priest 40+ 8.5W combo

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-06vs Goodman/Satterfield 40+ 8.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Tamara Fleming vs Dabney Porter / Beverly Tuttle6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-27vs Kruse 40+ 8.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesTamara Fleming / Libby Strickland vs Evelyn Strader / Jean Schmid6-2, 6-2
2022-09-15vs Oldis 40+ 8.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Helms / Libby Strickland vs Telfair Belangia / Kim Littrell1-6, 0-6
2022-09-01vs Cartee - 40+ 8.5W ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesLibby Strickland / Tamara Fleming vs Mimi Cartee / Amy Beth Kessinger7-5, 6-4
2022-08-29vs Goodman/Satterfield 40+ 8.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Henshall / Libby Strickland vs Dabney Porter / Jessica Smith6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Hall / Karen Regan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-25vs KBrown 40+ 8.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Hall / Adriana Hernandez vs Mary Batts / Minerva Loran6-0, 6-2
2022-08-11vs Kruse 40+ 8.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Linda Helms vs Sallye Parker / Ibby Greene6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Henshall / Libby Strickland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Linda Helms
published
4.00
Joanna Scott
published
3.88
Tamara Fleming
published
3.77
Lauren Nutt
published
3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.69
Lynn Jacoby
published
3.68
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
3.29
Leah Price
published
Linda Hall
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Susan Henshall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Libby Strickland + Linda Hall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Helms
20W–12L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
Joanna Scott
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
4.00
Tamara Fleming
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.88
Lauren Nutt
102W–82L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 11 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Lynn Jacoby
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Adriana Hernandez
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Leah Price
2W–16L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Henshall
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.