Teams

Kruse 40+ 8.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Women 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-27vs Scott/Priest 40+ 8.5W comboLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Jean Schmid vs Tamara Fleming / Libby Strickland2-6, 2-6
2022-09-22vs Oldis 40+ 8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Mann / Sallye Parker vs Beth Mayer / Kim Littrell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Evelyn Strader vs Jane Owens / Catherine Egerton1-6, 0-6
2022-09-15vs Milam 40+ 8.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Ibby Greene vs Caroline McAlister / Kelly Lombardino1-6, 3-6
2022-09-01vs KBrown 40+ 8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Mann / Sallye Parker vs Pam McAmis / Kathy Pace6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIbby Greene / Evelyn Strader vs Mary Batts / Ruxandra Buzoeanu5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-25vs Goodman/Satterfield 40+ 8.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Jean Schmid vs Joy Martin / Diane Kroeger6-2, 6-4
2022-08-11vs Scott/Priest 40+ 8.5W comboLost 02
L#1 DoublesSallye Parker / Ibby Greene vs Linda Hall / Linda Helms2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSherrie Kruse / Evelyn Strader vs Leah Price / Karen Regan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Ibby Greene
published 4
3.77
Alyssa Mann
published 4
3.59
Sallye Parker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.55
Amanda Reynolds
published 4
3.55
Deborah Nahser
published 4
3.45
Evelyn Strader
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Chris Amos
published 4
3.35
Julie Messner
published
3.35
Jean Schmid
published
3.18
Amy Devaney
published 3.5
Moira Dailey
published
Sherrie Kruse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Strader + Sherrie Kruse2746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ibby Greene
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Alyssa Mann
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Sallye Parker
146W–124L career · 7 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Amanda Reynolds
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Deborah Nahser
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Evelyn Strader
66W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
4
Chris Amos
5W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.41
Julie Messner
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Jean Schmid
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Amy Devaney
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Moira Dailey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherrie Kruse
32W–60L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.