Teams

Bourland/Stevenson

2021 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jennifer Stevenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2021-08-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Mihee Park / Wanda Ng6-1, 6-4
2021-08-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Elizabeth Ayotte / Deanna Phillips6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Elizabeth Maguire / Ruth Semon6-1, 6-1
2021-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Rochelle Pluymers / Rebecca Griffith6-4, 6-1
2021-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Yanchen Qi / Rachel Nies6-2, 6-3
2021-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Sarah Larson / Karen Kraus6-1, 6-2
2021-07-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Robin Welter / Chris van Leeuwen6-1, 6-1
2021-06-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Jennifer Stevenson vs Sara Crate / Katie Jurgenson6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jennifer Stevenson
91W–97L career
0%96%4%
3.41
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.