Teams

NITA W 35W18c Rush Copley (Bianchi/Powell)

2023 NITA2 Winter Adult 18 & Over · NITA Winter 18 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-16vs NITA W 35W18a TAM (Wright)Split 22
W#1 DoublesLeslie Andersen / Michelle Yacullo vs Julie Hahn / Marjorie Baltazar6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJill Odenbeck vs Margaret Izzo6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hanlon / Melinda Watson vs Christina Greeley / Denise Lam2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMaryann Balaun / Amy Harper vs Annalisa Tsai / Rochelle Probst1-6, 3-6
2023-04-08vs NITA W 35W18a TAM (Wright)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLori Brown / Amanda Hanlon vs Christina Greeley / Julie Hahn6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLee Ann Gossett / Amy Harper vs Dimitrina Schoyer / Patricia Bustamante6-7, 2-4
W#3 DoublesLeslie Andersen / Melinda Watson vs Nancy Valerio / Denise Lam2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-26vs NITA W 35W18a TAM (Wright)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hanlon / Tiffany Lesiecki vs Christina Greeley / Crystal Leighton1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLee Ann Gossett / Amy Harper vs Dimitrina Schoyer / Mandy Shaw6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaryann Balaun / Lori Brown vs Michele Young / Nancy Valerio6-4, 6-2
2023-03-05vs NITA W 35W18b Homewood (Bai/Young)Split 22
L#1 DoublesNorma Ericson / Lee Ann Gossett vs Michelle Parks / Susan Leitao0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Hanlon vs Brittany Armbruster6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMaureen Henderson / Michelle Yacullo vs Sheila Bai / Jessica Barnes6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaryann Balaun / Amy Harper vs Gemma Ross / Barbara Gordner6-3, 6-2
2023-02-19vs NITA W 35W18a TAM (Wright)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffany Lesiecki / Jill Odenbeck vs Christi Harrison / Michele Young6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Harper / Maureen Henderson vs Rochelle Probst / Grace Kuhrt6-7, 3-5
L#3 DoublesLori Brown / Lee Ann Gossett vs Catie Hughes / Nancy Valerio0-6, 3-6
2023-02-11vs NITA W 35W18b Homewood (Bai/Young)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Langley / Michelle Yacullo vs Shelley Young / Susan Leitao3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNorma Ericson / Lee Ann Gossett vs Sheila Bai / Jessica Barnes0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Hanlon / Tiffany Lesiecki vs Jennifer Huffaker / Gemma Ross6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMelissa Langley / Jill Odenbeck vs Nicole Borck / Brittany Armbruster6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSheri Anderson / Maureen Henderson vs Shelley Young / Latrice Montaque6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaryann Balaun / Lori Brown vs Marjorie McGuire / Gemma Ross6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NITA Winter 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jill Odenbeck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.28
Amanda Hanlon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Amy Harper
published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Yacullo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Norma Ericson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Maureen Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Melinda Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lee Ann Gossett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Maryann Balaun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Langley
published
Minami Powell
published
Sheri Anderson
published
Tiffany Lesiecki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Yacullo + Maureen Henderson6851% games+4.2% vs expected
Amanda Hanlon + Melinda Watson6352% games−2.9% vs expected
Maryann Balaun + Michelle Yacullo314 matchesnot enough data
Maryann Balaun + Tiffany Lesiecki134 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Yacullo + Lee Ann Gossett224 matchesnot enough data
Norma Ericson + Lee Ann Gossett123 matchesnot enough data
Maryann Balaun + Amanda Hanlon213 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Hanlon + Michelle Yacullo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Odenbeck
215W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
3.5
Amanda Hanlon
78W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Amy Harper
29W–50L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Michelle Yacullo
166W–110L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Norma Ericson
87W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Maureen Henderson
118W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Melinda Watson
21W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lee Ann Gossett
16W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maryann Balaun
21W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Langley
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Minami Powell
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Anderson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Lesiecki
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.