Teams

Samuell Grand/Hilliard-Melson W3.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-12vs Canyon Creek/Cotter-Allen W3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLibby Johnson / Courtney Dowling vs Gretchen Allen / Ashley Samber7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMegan Denton / Megan Leftwich vs Michele Erturkuner / Cindy Hartley6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Fagan / Ida Gleaton vs Cathy Phillips / Debbie Bradshaw6-2, 6-0
2025-06-05vs High Point/Escutia W3.5Won 21
L#1 SinglesArlene Kirkland vs Eve Liu4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Leftwich / Kathy Fagan vs Paige Bower / Lisa Swirczynski6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesIda Gleaton vs Michelle Sowards6-2, 6-1
2025-05-22vs Stonebridge/Giacchino-Cantu W3.5Won 31
W#1 SinglesArlene Kirkland vs Theresa Lane6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Dowling / Kimberly Melson vs Nicole Murphy / Nicole Libby7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesIda Gleaton vs Jennifer Flock6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Fagan / Megan Leftwich vs Cristine Giacchino / Pamela Lang1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-08vs McKinney/Hedblom W3.5Lost 13
W#1 DoublesKathy Fagan / Stephanie Hilliard vs Donna Legault / Judy Steglich6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMegan Denton / Kimberly Melson vs Debbie Buchanan / Sandi Silverman5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKatie Bowden vs Audrey Pala0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Charles / Ida Gleaton vs Paula Marbach / MaryLee VanHooker3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Rochelle Watson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
REGINA RIVERA
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.45
Karen Saland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.38
Kimberly Melson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Megan Leftwich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Stephanie Hilliard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Arlene Kirkland
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Tina Kimbell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Sarah Charles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Courtney Dowling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Ida Gleaton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Elizabeth Peaslee
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.08
Katie Bowden
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Kathy Fagan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Diane Josephakis
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Libby Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Melson + Sarah Charles213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Melson + Stephanie Hilliard213 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Melson + Kathy Fagan123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Bowden + Sarah Charles033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rochelle Watson
32W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
REGINA RIVERA
22W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Karen Saland
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kimberly Melson
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Megan Leftwich
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Stephanie Hilliard
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Arlene Kirkland
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Tina Kimbell
12W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Sarah Charles
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Courtney Dowling
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Ida Gleaton
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Elizabeth Peaslee
5W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Katie Bowden
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Kathy Fagan
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.93
3
Diane Josephakis
6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Libby Johnson
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.