Teams

RVP - Moore

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Chrissa Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Sally Starling
published
3.82
Mary Harper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Toury
published 4
3.74
Julea Hovey
published
3.70
Jessica Mynhier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Susan Atkinson
published
3.65
Susan Trammell
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published
3.65
Trudie Gill-Keenly
published
3.63
Kathleen Rogerson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Kelly Anne Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Angela Magnuson
usually #4 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.62
Kelly Mercier
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Natalie Stephens
published
3.54
Keisha Uhle
published
3.42
Laurel Landon
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurel Landon + Susan Trammell7068% games+16.0% vs expected
Angela Magnuson + Kathleen Rogerson4453% games+7.3% vs expected
Kelly Anne Moore + Kelly Mercier17460% games+5.3% vs expected
Angela Magnuson + Keisha Uhle5154% games−0.0% vs expected
Laurel Landon + Kelly Anne Moore3355% gamesnot enough data
Laurel Landon + Trudie Gill-Keenly4162% gamesnot enough data
Keisha Uhle + Julea Hovey2345% gamesnot enough data
Susan Trammell + Trudie Gill-Keenly314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chrissa Matthews
27W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Sally Starling
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Mary Harper
36W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Catherine Toury
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julea Hovey
33W–18L career · no lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
Jessica Mynhier
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Susan Atkinson
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Susan Trammell
72W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
Trudie Gill-Keenly
27W–14L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Kathleen Rogerson
23W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Kelly Anne Moore
41W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Angela Magnuson
81W–36L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Kelly Mercier
54W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Natalie Stephens
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Keisha Uhle
30W–13L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Laurel Landon
57W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.