Teams

SNarayan-CHTC

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-40 & Over · 40 & Over 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-25vs JByrd-ENOWon 10
W#2 DoublesNathan Bearman / Dan Clemson vs Bongsang Cho / Seth Layton6-3, 6-3
2025-06-25vs EAnderson-DFCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSravan Narayan / Jackson Naftel vs Jay Goldstein / Jeff Francki6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNathan Bearman / Reed Breneman vs Edward Anderson / Rod Snyder7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs DBaddour-CHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesZachary Osofsky / Todd Smith vs Clint Myers / Alexander Okulski6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGabriel Dichter / Reed Breneman vs Paul Hodulik / Jeff Tillman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephen Ryan / Richard Henderson vs Robert Hutchins / Richard Woods6-7, 3-6
2025-06-11vs SBible-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJackson Naftel / Sravan Narayan vs Stewart Bible / John Pelphrey3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-05-28vs EAnderson-DFCLost 01
L#2 DoublesZachary Osofsky / Michael Meltsner vs Edward Anderson / Rod Snyder6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Sravan Narayan
published
4.19
Gabriel Dichter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Jackson Naftel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Alexis Maklakoff
published 4.5
4.12
Zachary Osofsky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Dan Clemson
published 4.5
3.98
Reed Breneman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Michael Meltsner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Nathan Bearman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Burak Erdim
published 3.5
3.61
Matthew Curry
published
Stephen Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Bearman + Reed Breneman303 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Osofsky + Dan Clemson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sravan Narayan
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Gabriel Dichter
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Jackson Naftel
66W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alexis Maklakoff
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Zachary Osofsky
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Dan Clemson
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
Reed Breneman
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Michael Meltsner
58W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Nathan Bearman
118W–60L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
3.5
Burak Erdim
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Stephen Ryan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.