Teams

SBible-UNC

2025 Eno River Tri-Level-40 & Over · 40 & Over 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-23vs JByrd-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurence Isaacs / Jonathan Canon vs Richard McClenny / Erik J Erikson4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJason Liss / Barry Gooch vs Seunghyun Hwang / Bongsang Cho2-6, 1-6
2025-07-16vs SNarayan-CHTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Pelphrey / Jonathan Canon vs Gabriel Dichter / Todd Smith1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarry Gooch / Sam Roach vs Reed Breneman / Dan Clemson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Bream / James White vs Burak Erdim / Richard Henderson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-07-12vs EAnderson-DFCWon 10
W#1 DoublesStewart Bible / Jonathan Canon vs Jay Goldstein / Rod Snyder4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-09vs DBaddour-CHCCLost 02
L#2 DoublesBarry Gooch / Arun Manikumar vs Niels Lameijer / Jeff Tillman4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPeter Bream / Rolland Olin vs Richard Woods / Robert Hutchins2-6, 3-6
2025-06-18vs JByrd-ENOSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJonathan Canon / Sam Roach vs Blake Hutchinson / Richard McClenny7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarry Gooch / Remco Laan vs Youngjun Lee / Seunghyun Hwang3-6, 1-6
2025-05-21vs DBaddour-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSam Roach / Jonathan Canon vs Kenneth Nelson / Christian Shelby6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarry Gooch / Juan Andrade vs David Baddour / Niels Lameijer7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Jonathan Canon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Stewart Bible
published
4.10
Remco Laan
published
4.07
John Pelphrey
published
3.79
Barry Gooch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Juan Andrade
published
Arun Manikumar
published 4
3.73
3.68
Jason Liss
published
3.63
Laurence Isaacs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Peter Bream
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Rolland Olin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jonathan Canon
102W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
Stewart Bible
15W–28L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.11
Remco Laan
14W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
4.10
John Pelphrey
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4
Barry Gooch
112W–109L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Juan Andrade
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Arun Manikumar
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Green
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jason Liss
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Laurence Isaacs
48W–87L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Peter Bream
98W–43L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Rolland Olin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.