Teams

CCRC - Mattson

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 3.5 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-19vs CSRATA/Stephanie RameyLost 01
L#4 DoublesKaren Ard / Michell Davis vs Laurel Jones / Debra Lindburg7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-12vs Odell Weeks - ElmshaeuserLost 01
L#1 SinglesMichell Davis vs Ann Fago0-6, 3-6
2025-03-06vs Riverview - SmithWon 10
W#4 DoublesKaren Ard / Michell Davis vs Debra Lindburg / Laurel Landon6-3, 6-4
2025-03-04vs Riverview - SmithLost 23
L#1 DoublesCecile Fletcher / Brenda Jennings vs Debra Lindburg / Carlene Clark5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichell Davis vs Sandra Burton Kelley0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMargie Staples / Joyce Dross vs Jennifer Dunstan / Samantha DeLappe6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Heigle / Dawn Sindelar vs Helen Campbell / Lois Niese4-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesJoan Steinberg / Gloria Mattson vs Kim Smith / Betsy Luquire6-0, 6-2
2025-02-26vs NTC - De LeonWon 10
W#4 DoublesTalita Bernardi / Michell Davis vs Brooke McGuire / Stacey Flink3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-01-29vs CCRC - PlummerLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Ard / Michell Davis vs Denise Vaughn / Jennifer Olmstead0-6, 3-6
2025-01-28vs Riverview - SmithLost 23
L#1 DoublesCecile Fletcher / Brenda Jennings vs Debra Lindburg / Suzanne Fletcher3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMichell Davis vs Ashley Blaney2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristy Shurling / Gloria Mattson vs Helen Campbell / Lois Niese6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Sindelar / Margie Staples vs Sandra Burton Kelley / Samantha DeLappe4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesJoan Steinberg / Patricia Nuzzaci vs Betsy Luquire / Traci Wright6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-15vs Odell Weeks - TimmermanWon 10
W#3 DoublesTalita Bernardi / Michell Davis vs Laura Donatelli / Dee Dee Redd7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Diane Hess
published 3.5
3.23
Cecile Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Christy Shurling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Vivian York
published
3.10
Brenda Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Terri Thaxton
published
3.00
Ann Heigle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Michell Davis
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 19% · published
2.93
Dawn Sindelar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Margie Staples
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Joyce Dross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Gloria Mattson
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Patricia Nuzzaci
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Joan Steinberg
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Ann McQuaig
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecile Fletcher + Christy Shurling141349% games−3.1% vs expected
Vivian York + Gloria Mattson4443% games−3.5% vs expected
Terri Thaxton + Vivian York2348% games−5.8% vs expected
Cecile Fletcher + Brenda Jennings3348% gamesnot enough data
Terri Thaxton + Gloria Mattson3348% gamesnot enough data
Joan Steinberg + Gloria Mattson1435% gamesnot enough data
Cecile Fletcher + Terri Thaxton224 matchesnot enough data
Cecile Fletcher + Gloria Mattson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Hess
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Cecile Fletcher
25W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Christy Shurling
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Vivian York
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Brenda Jennings
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Terri Thaxton
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Ann Heigle
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Michell Davis
64W–82L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Dawn Sindelar
5W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Margie Staples
19W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
Joyce Dross
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Gloria Mattson
22W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Patricia Nuzzaci
2W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
Joan Steinberg
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
3
Ann McQuaig
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.