Teams

Team 3 Net Jobs

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-26vs Team 4Won 20
W#1 DoublesLynnita Montague-Daddio / Asma Shah vs Kimberly McPhee / Dawn Werner7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Icore vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-7, 3-1
2023-03-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesRosy Mcgillan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-04vs Team 5Won 10
W#1 DoublesRosy Mcgillan / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Jane Ignacio / Anja Giphart7-6, 5-0
2023-02-25vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Heuer / Rosy Mcgillan vs Patricia Hathaway / Kate Trask3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLynnita Montague-Daddio vs Kim Hovda6-0, 6-1
2023-02-04vs Team 1 RJ Net AssetsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Heuer / Rosy Mcgillan vs Joyce Aramburu / Lena Ferris6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Icore vs Cortney Brown6-3, 6-4
2023-01-29vs Team 5Won 10
W#1 DoublesRosy Mcgillan / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Aklil Getachew / Anja Giphart6-3, 6-2
2023-01-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Walker / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Jennifer Park / Caroline Houston6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-15vs Team 4Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Heuer / Lynnita Montague-Daddio vs Ingrid Hunsicker / Kimberly McPhee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Kelly Walker
published
3.02
Asma Shah
published 3
2.88
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.57
Marcy Davidson
published
2.46
Rosy Mcgillan
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 2.5
2.46
Amy Heuer
published 2.5
2.29
Sarah Icore
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosy Mcgillan + Sarah Icore2644% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Mcgillan + Lynnita Montague-Daddio2346% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Icore + Lynnita Montague-Daddio314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Walker
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Asma Shah
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Lynnita Montague-Daddio
108W–128L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Marcy Davidson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
2.57
2.5
Rosy Mcgillan
40W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
0%60%40%
2.46
2.5
Amy Heuer
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%62%38%
2.46
2.5
Sarah Icore
46W–59L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.