Teams

Team 4

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26vs Team 3 Net JobsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly McPhee / Dawn Werner vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio / Asma Shah5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Sarah Icore7-6, 1-3
2023-03-18vs Team 5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly McPhee / KERSTIN DEMKO vs Heather Hall / Ann Bauer6-2, 6-3
2023-02-05vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Lucidi / Kimberly McPhee vs Patricia Hathaway / Sandra Kim3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Monica Popp1-6, 1-6
2023-01-28vs Team 1 RJ Net AssetsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly McPhee / Ingrid Hunsicker vs Lena Ferris / Karen Boulineaux6-4, 5-2
2023-01-15vs Team 3 Net JobsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIngrid Hunsicker / Kimberly McPhee vs Amy Heuer / Lynnita Montague-Daddio2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-08vs Team 5Split 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly McPhee / Georgia Meyers vs Heather Hall / Boriana Chopova6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSandy Lucidi vs Jane Ignacio6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Kimberly McPhee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Sandy Lucidi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
KERSTIN DEMKO
published
2.29
Deanna Breda
published 2.5
1.89
Nancy F Schmidt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ingrid Hunsicker + Kimberly McPhee224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly McPhee + Sandy Lucidi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kimberly McPhee
53W–28L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
111W–174L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Sandy Lucidi
38W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
KERSTIN DEMKO
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Deanna Breda
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29
Nancy F Schmidt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Kerilyn McMichael-Beltran
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.