Teams

PLEASANTON 18AW3.5A-DT

2025 ADULT 18&Over - Daytime · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesRita Sandhu / Jett Koketsu vs Aida Cazares / Abbie Serrano6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-28vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.5A-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesRita Sandhu / Elizaveta Cherepanova vs Sonia Whitfield / Lauren Roseman6-2, 6-3
2025-04-24vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW3.5B-DTWon 10
W#1 DoublesRita Sandhu / Elizaveta Cherepanova vs Paulina Bettink / Deena Elfar6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRita Sandhu / Diane Bauman vs Bailey Rianda / Sharon Winchester0-6, 2-6
2025-04-11vs ALMADEN SR 18AW3.5A-DTLost 01
L#1 DoublesRita Sandhu / Jett Koketsu vs Catherine Caouette / Melynda Davenport5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Alison Erhart
published 3.5
3.46
Rita Sandhu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.43
Kimba Warford
published
3.43
Lara Facteau
published
3.42
Lili Occena
published
3.40
Diem Nguyen
published 3.5
3.37
Nga Gross
published
3.34
Belinda Castillo
published 3.5
3.28
Patti Presto
published
3.26
Miwon Vella
published
3.24
Julieta Leong
published
3.21
Trish O'Connor
published
3.20
Dora Meier Lee
published
3.15
Karen de Martini
published
3.12
Wendy Greer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lili Occena + Rita Sandhu4357% games+15.7% vs expected
Trish O'Connor + Dora Meier Lee224 matchesnot enough data
Kimba Warford + Belinda Castillo213 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Castillo + Dora Meier Lee303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Erhart
35W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Rita Sandhu
19W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Kimba Warford
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Lara Facteau
27W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Lili Occena
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Diem Nguyen
26W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.40
Nga Gross
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Belinda Castillo
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Patti Presto
25W–29L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Miwon Vella
24W–23L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Julieta Leong
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Trish O'Connor
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Dora Meier Lee
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Karen de Martini
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Wendy Greer
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.