Teams

Parr 40s 4.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-13vs Flannery/Howarth 40s 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Yukari Matsuoka vs Florence Henon / Cary Scully6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-06vs McFarlin 40s 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Yukari Matsuoka vs Tara Burgio / Lynn Guglielmo6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-04-22vs Barnett 40s 4.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Erin Huffines vs Beth Bell / Jessica Smith2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Dennehy / Kim Hunt vs Diane Kroeger / Rolinde Cleyman1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-15vs Rosenbower 40s 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Yukari Matsuoka vs Linda Hall / Bee Baker2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Abraham / Kim Hunt vs Kimberly Eberhard / Gloria Eckman7-6, 6-1
2022-04-01vs Clancy D. 40s 4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesYukari Matsuoka / Erin Huffines vs Debbie Clancy / Susan Parsons6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Herron / Kim Hunt vs Sue Blanchard / Cindy Sumner6-1, 6-4
2022-03-25vs Shamburg 40s 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Yukari Matsuoka vs Bridget Gislimberti / Jennifer Mays6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-18vs Egerton 40s 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Kim Hunt vs Sarah Dunning / Brenda Willis6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Heather Parr
published 4
3.94
Whitney Ellis
published
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.82
Leigh Abraham
published
3.71
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.68
Felicia Price
published 4
3.65
Tracy Harlan
published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Jacqueline Herron
published 3.5
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hunt + Erin Huffines5556% games+3.5% vs expected
Kim Hunt + Tracy Harlan224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Harlan + Heather Parr224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Parr
40W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
3.97
Whitney Ellis
49W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
Leigh Abraham
30W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Felicia Price
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Tracy Harlan
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 12 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Jacqueline Herron
36W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.