Teams

Team 6 Court Warriors

2024 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-10-26vs Team 4 Tennis the MenaceWon 10
W#2 SinglesDana Chladek vs Irena Bucci6-4, 4-1
2024-10-19vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Amanda Grotos6-4, 2-3
L#2 SinglesGail Douglass vs Monica Zakaria3-6, 2-5
2024-10-13vs Team 5 NOVA CrushSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Renee Shipe3-6, 2-0
L#3 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Arial Pegues1-6, 2-4
2024-10-11vs Team 3 KimWon 10
W#3 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Sueyun Hsieh6-0, 6-2
2024-10-05vs Team 1 Wasabi PeasSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Anna Kropf6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesGail Douglass vs Kathleen Kane2-6, 1-6
2024-09-29vs Team 4 Tennis the MenaceWon 20
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Margaret Rubin6-2, 4-4
W#3 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Kimberlee Overdeck3-6, 4-1
2024-09-21vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Chladek vs Amanda Grotos6-4, 4-2
L#3 SinglesGail Douglass vs Kristin Satterfield6-7, 1-1
2024-09-14vs Team 5 NOVA CrushLost 01
L#2 SinglesGail Douglass vs Vera Ryss1-6, 1-6
2024-09-06vs Team 3 KimLost 02
L#2 SinglesCindy Mathys vs Margarita Baldwin4-5
L#3 SinglesTerry Cocozza vs Cameron Craig2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Erin Mara
published
3.85
Kristin Musselman
published
3.69
Cindy Mathys
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.67
Karyn ODonnell
published
3.67
Dana Chladek
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.57
Gail Douglass
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.43
Terry Cocozza
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Marina Franklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mathys + Terry Cocozza314 matchesnot enough data
Gail Douglass + Terry Cocozza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Mara
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.87
Kristin Musselman
25W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Cindy Mathys
98W–103L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
Karyn ODonnell
66W–58L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Dana Chladek
166W–70L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Gail Douglass
117W–174L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Terry Cocozza
230W–349L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Marina Franklin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.