Teams

Sports Mall-Marz/Smith

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.5W PM

16 players · average NTRP 4.44 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Diana Granger vs Casey Pickett / Lisa Sterbenz6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-02vs Liberty Park-Woodbury/MillerWon 20
W#2 DoublesLynette Duran / Libble Ginster vs Michelle Porter / Jane McQuade6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Phoebe Hailey vs Sue Curtis / Marianne Squires6-3, 6-3
2025-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Diana Granger vs Emily Wallace / Nanette Heath6-4, 7-6
2025-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesKriss Young / Phoebe Hailey vs Karina Herman / Amy Woolley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-03vs Cottonwood Club-EischeidWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Julie DeLong vs Jennifer Korb / Lindsay Knight6-3, 6-3
2025-06-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesDebra Rawlings / Libble Ginster vs Arashan Heikkila / Susan Picou1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLynette Duran / Debra Rawlings vs Christine Fotheringham / Julie Cooley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5W PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Marz/Smith62221027266
2Liberty Park-Woodbury/Miller62161638282
3Cottonwood Club-Eischeid44181432272
4Liberty Park-Wallace/Kemp35122046334
5Liberty Park-Sterbenz/Bernard17122048335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Lynette Duran
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.26
Ashley Park
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 4.5
4.25
Diana Granger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Allison Rideout
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Karin Smith
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.17
Debra Rawlings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Libble Ginster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Phoebe Hailey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.16
Amber Jorgensen
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
3.98
Jennifer Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.98
Linda Marz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.85
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
3.77
Robyn Scharman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Regina Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie DeLong
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Kriss Young
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynette Duran + Libble Ginster8166% games+10.4% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Karin Smith7166% games+9.5% vs expected
Robyn Scharman + Regina Johnson16756% games+6.1% vs expected
Lynette Duran + Jennifer Hathaway10955% games+4.5% vs expected
Karin Smith + Regina Johnson111352% games+0.9% vs expected
Debra Rawlings + Diana Granger14558% games+0.2% vs expected
Debra Rawlings + Linda Marz8256% games−0.0% vs expected
Linda Marz + Lynette Duran292055% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lynette Duran
186W–144L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Ashley Park
95W–40L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Diana Granger
64W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Allison Rideout
23W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karin Smith
143W–70L career · 10 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Debra Rawlings
161W–102L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Libble Ginster
71W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Phoebe Hailey
29W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Amber Jorgensen
114W–36L career · 10 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Jennifer Hathaway
64W–54L career · 10 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
4.5
Linda Marz
140W–118L career · 12 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Tiffany Kasteler
166W–104L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Robyn Scharman
118W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Regina Johnson
122W–100L career · 10 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
Julie DeLong
72W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kriss Young
39W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.