Teams

Nelligan / Geary

2023 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

20 players · average NTRP 3.55 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-11vs JudgeWon 10
W#1 DoublesNorifumi Urao / Dawn McLaughlin vs Kara Krueger / Aaron Schiffrik7-5, 7-5
2023-03-04vs SFTC - WallensteinLost 01
L#2 DoublesOle Westergaard / Stephanie Thompson vs Stephen Nesspor / Andra Lee6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs Western: 40-LOVELost 01
L#3 DoublesDawn McLaughlin / Norifumi Urao vs Ja Youn Kwon / Wonhee Cho6-7, 3-6
2023-02-18vs JudgeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Kaye / Ole Westergaard vs Anne Brandt / Kenneth Alweis6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDawn McLaughlin / Richard Ingraham vs Lisa Campagna / Patrick Brown6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-02-04vs Western: 40-LOVELost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Thompson / Ole Westergaard vs Jeeyoon Kim / Joon Young Kim3-6, 1-6
2023-01-28vs JudgeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrianna Laureti / Danilo Fernando vs Kara Krueger / Aaron Schiffrik6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKenneth Geary / Kaitlin Sgarlata vs Dan Ferguson / Anocha Walsh3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-01-21vs SFTC - WallensteinWon 10
W#2 DoublesNorifumi Urao / Dawn McLaughlin vs Jesse Daino / Audrey Sauer6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Brianna Laureti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.91
Michael Leopold
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Ann Leuenberger
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Norifumi Urao
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.63
Richard Ingraham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.41
Anthony Farella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Stephanie Thompson
published
3.34
Mary Kaye
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.33
Lisa Nelligan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Christopher Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Kenneth Geary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.13
Danilo Fernando
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.03
Jacki Goldberg
published
Dawn McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Emily Vacher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kaitlin Sgarlata
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marianne Lee
published
Ole Westergaard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Hall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Nelligan + Richard Ingraham16269% games+12.7% vs expected
Anthony Farella + Emily Vacher151351% games+6.0% vs expected
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold + Michael Leopold15660% games+5.7% vs expected
Mary Kaye + Norifumi Urao11166% games+2.8% vs expected
Danilo Fernando + Brianna Laureti6252% games−3.4% vs expected
Lisa Nelligan + Kenneth Geary6649% games−5.1% vs expected
Dawn McLaughlin + Norifumi Urao4257% games−6.9% vs expected
Christopher Fletcher + Ann Leuenberger9156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brianna Laureti
87W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Michael Leopold
81W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Ann Leuenberger
151W–85L career · 9 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Norifumi Urao
114W–34L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Anthony Farella
79W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
Stephanie Thompson
29W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Mary Kaye
147W–99L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Lisa Nelligan
89W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
70W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Christopher Fletcher
31W–14L career · type M · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kenneth Geary
59W–78L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.14
3
Danilo Fernando
25W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Jacki Goldberg
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Dawn McLaughlin
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Emily Vacher
47W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kaitlin Sgarlata
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Marianne Lee
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ole Westergaard
33W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Hall
47W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.