Teams

K.Levine

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Laurie Holderness vs Rebecca Harris / Tracy Lathan6-1, 6-1
2023-04-21vs S.Brodsgaard/DAdams 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Levine / Christine Waychoff vs Shayne Brodsgaard / Jenna Wooten-Quade6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Teeter / Ellina Max vs Diane Adams / Palma DeSorbo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-20vs K.Manooch2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesKrystal Glover vs Alicia Gilleskie6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Hampton / Ellina Max vs Meredith Miller / Alana Goldstein6-0, 6-1
2023-03-31vs K.EshamWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Ashley Burch vs Lauren Crow / Dalton Hunt7-6, 6-3
2023-03-24vs G.ScogginWon 10
W#1 SinglesKrystal Glover vs Mary Margaret Ross6-2, 6-1
2023-03-17vs J.StallingsWon 20
W#1 SinglesChristine Waychoff vs Lorna Hirsch6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Laurie Holderness vs Lori Harrelson / Jill Foster6-1, 6-1
2023-03-11vs K.Manooch2.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Waychoff / Wendy Teeter vs Melissa Keener / Michele Sullivan6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEllina Max vs Dina Berling6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Lauren Hampton vs Beth Johnson / Alicia Gilleskie6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kristen Levine
published
3.13
Elizabeth Rupert
published
2.99
Katie Warren
published
2.79
Christine Waychoff
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Laurie Holderness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Ellina Max
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.46
Krystal Glover
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
Wendy Teeter
published
2.41
Lauren Hampton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellina Max + Krystal Glover7355% gamesnot enough data
Katie Warren + Elizabeth Rupert3255% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Holderness + Krystal Glover134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Levine
27W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Elizabeth Rupert
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.13
Katie Warren
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Christine Waychoff
73W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Laurie Holderness
78W–107L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Ellina Max
59W–61L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.56
3
Krystal Glover
36W–63L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.46
Wendy Teeter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.46
Lauren Hampton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.