Teams

HW YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs EM GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesTiffanie Lenderman / Vickie Lasseter vs Betsy Berry / Lauren Knight4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTiffany Steinmetz vs Andrea Lauricella6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Superka / JULIE HANCOCK vs Kathy Klein / Susan Engeman0-6, 6-7
2026-07-06vs SS-H YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesTiffany Steinmetz / Tiffanie Lenderman vs Sheila Baker / Katie Johnson6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnnie Basham / JULIE HANCOCK vs Karen Miller / Betsy Agnvall6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbara Superka / Vivian Perla vs Shelley Reed / Jennifer Gruidel1-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs HV BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesLara Carlson / Tiffanie Lenderman vs Margo Ellis / Linda Sjoberg6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTiffany Steinmetz vs Stacy Beharry1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Georgelos / Holly Shrewsbury vs Leslie Moody / Danielle Kennedy6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Superka / Vivian Perla vs Dana Kershner / Dawn Duhamel1-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs SKY BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesTiffanie Lenderman / Vickie Lasseter vs Katherine Sullivan / Sara Visser7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnnie Basham / Holly Georgelos vs Sara Colvin / Lauryn Meyer2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVivian Perla / Tiffany Steinmetz vs Jennifer Rigsby / Gayle Long1-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs SS-D PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesHolly Georgelos / Tiffanie Lenderman vs Tisha Smith / Jill Schladetzky6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVickie Lasseter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnnie Basham / Holly Shrewsbury vs Evyan Maniatis / Carina Clancy6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTiffany Steinmetz / Vivian Perla vs Robin Earley / McKay Pittman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs HFII BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesAnnie Basham / Tiffany Steinmetz vs Brittany Ross / Heather Dewey3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Georgelos vs Elizabeth Gotto3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Shrewsbury / Lara Carlson vs Kara Carey / Maria Shea6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Superka / Vivian Perla vs Linda Staples / Bonnie Mccoumb0-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs SS-LT REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Georgelos / Annie Basham vs Martha Rubi-Byers / Elizabeth Bell1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLara Carlson / Tiffany Steinmetz vs Zorana Sterling / Leanne Franke6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Superka / Holly Shrewsbury vs Sharon Iuston / Laurie Porter4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Lara Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Tiffanie Lenderman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brenda Mahedy
published 3
2.71
Annie Basham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Holly Shrewsbury
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Holly Georgelos
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
JULIE HANCOCK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Tiffany Steinmetz
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.45
Vickie Lasseter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.38
Barbara Superka
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.33
Vivian Perla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffanie Lenderman + Lara Carlson5167% games+10.0% vs expected
Vivian Perla + Holly Shrewsbury4648% games+9.7% vs expected
Holly Georgelos + Lara Carlson4159% games+6.8% vs expected
Holly Shrewsbury + Holly Georgelos5650% games+4.0% vs expected
Vickie Lasseter + Holly Georgelos4746% games+0.2% vs expected
Tiffany Steinmetz + Barbara Superka41537% games−0.4% vs expected
Annie Basham + Vickie Lasseter1447% games−0.6% vs expected
Vivian Perla + Barbara Superka3935% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lara Carlson
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Tiffanie Lenderman
47W–58L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Brenda Mahedy
6W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Annie Basham
7W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Holly Shrewsbury
54W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Holly Georgelos
35W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
JULIE HANCOCK
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Tiffany Steinmetz
33W–86L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Vickie Lasseter
23W–48L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
Barbara Superka
83W–118L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
3
Vivian Perla
28W–65L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.