Teams

EM GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs HW YELLOWWon 40
W#1 DoublesBetsy Berry / Lauren Knight vs Tiffanie Lenderman / Vickie Lasseter6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrea Lauricella vs Tiffany Steinmetz4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Klein / Susan Engeman vs Barbara Superka / JULIE HANCOCK6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJen Fornstrom / Janet Willson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-06vs SS-LT REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJen Fornstrom / Kathy Klein vs Leanne Franke / Zorana Sterling3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Grow / Andrea Lauricella vs Martha Rubi-Byers / Elizabeth Bell4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Allen / Janet Willson vs Sharon Iuston / Laurie Porter4-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs HFII BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJen Fornstrom / Susan Engeman vs Jennifer Frontz / Mary Roth3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKristen Schiffner vs Heather Dewey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBetsy Berry / Lauren Knight vs Linda Staples / Bonnie Mccoumb6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrea Lauricella / Shannon Gray vs Kara Carey / Maria Shea3-6, 4-6
2026-06-22vs SS-H YELLOWSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJen Fornstrom / Susan Engeman vs Suzette Loving / Karen Miller6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Lauricella vs Shannon Converse6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Klein / Janet Willson vs Katie Johnson / Debbie Lepetsos3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Gray / Lauren Knight vs Kyle Davis / Jennifer Gruidel1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-15vs HV BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesLisa Allen / Janet Willson vs Leslie Clay / Stacy Beharry5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCarol Grow vs Danielle Kennedy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShannon Gray / Andrea Lauricella vs Dana Kershner / Margo Ellis4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBetsy Berry / Lauren Knight vs Anna Larsen / Linda Sjoberg6-0, 6-3
2026-06-08vs SKY BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesJen Fornstrom / Susan Engeman vs Lauryn Meyer / Jessie Johnson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristen Schiffner vs Sharon Alton0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Klein / Lisa Allen vs Katherine Sullivan / Amy Mcilwain2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShannon Gray / Betsy Berry vs Rachel Byrne / Gayle Long1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-01vs SS-D PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Allen / Janet Willson vs Margaret Lee / Tisha Smith4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJen Fornstrom / Susan Engeman vs Jill Schladetzky / Jill Ellsworth6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarol Grow / Lauren Knight vs McKay Pittman / Haley Evans6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Betsy Berry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Jen Fornstrom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.70
Kathy Klein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.60
Andrea Lauricella
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.60
Lauren Knight
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Carol Grow
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.50
Kristen Schiffner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.50
Janet Willson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Susan Engeman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.39
Shannon Gray
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Engeman + Jen Fornstrom4847% games+5.4% vs expected
Betsy Berry + Lauren Knight5259% games+2.9% vs expected
Jen Fornstrom + Kathy Klein2351% games+2.9% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Kathy Klein21041% games−3.3% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Janet Willson2537% games−9.7% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Carol Grow1535% games−12.5% vs expected
Susan Engeman + Kristen Schiffner3260% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Klein + Janet Willson4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsy Berry
19W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Jen Fornstrom
17W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
2.71
Kathy Klein
43W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Andrea Lauricella
60W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Lauren Knight
32W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Carol Grow
21W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Kristen Schiffner
21W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.50
Janet Willson
23W–39L career · 4 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Susan Engeman
31W–62L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.50
Shannon Gray
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.