Teams

8-AJarvis-CHTC

2022 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-22vs 7-GLoFrese-Eno 2.5 18Won 20
W#1 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Leslie Jackson1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Becki Cleveland3-2
2022-07-18vs 4-AKlein/JDeConto-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Santae Cooper3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCristina Raiti vs Julie DeConto3-6, 1-6
2022-07-11vs 5-JOREGAN-HRLost 01
L#1 SinglesColleen Starns vs Lissa Gotwals2-6, 0-6
2022-06-27vs 2-JYoung-EnoLost 03
L#1 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Kristin Cooley6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesColleen Starns vs Matalaba Napier5-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesCristina Raiti vs Loralie Bible5-7, 5-7
2022-06-20vs 3-LCannon-EnoWon 10
W#2 SinglesColleen Starns vs Shannon Bartle2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-13vs 9-AHeymann-UNCWon 10
W#1 SinglesKirby Jethro vs Jennifer Gates-Foster6-4, 6-3
2022-06-06vs 1-KRyan-HVCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Deborah Hertzog4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Baxter
published 3
2.79
Kirby Jethro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Dongbo Lu
published 3
2.59
Cristina Raiti
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.47
Colleen Starns
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.46
Jessica Alzamora
published
2.12
Laura Chaves Cerdas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirby Jethro + Cristina Raiti3543% gamesnot enough data
Amber Jarvis + Lisa Baxter3258% gamesnot enough data
Amber Jarvis + Colleen Starns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Jarvis
92W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3
Lisa Baxter
92W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
Kirby Jethro
37W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Dongbo Lu
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cristina Raiti
36W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%59%41%
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
Laura Chaves Cerdas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.