Teams

Riverstone - C. Marchand

2021 Collier Mixed 18 & Over Spring · Mixed 18 & over 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Powidzki / Amber Hill vs James Yoder / Susan Lee3-6, 1-6
2021-05-01vs Naples Grande - L. LaveryLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom Powidzki / Lynn Johns vs Troy Rush / Aline Harris3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRyan Kinser / Sara Wachs vs Cynthia Streibich / Wayne Streibich7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2021-04-24vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 10
W#2 DoublesRyan Kinser / Sara Wachs vs Elvin Vargas / Nora Slusar6-0, 6-2
2021-04-17vs Marco YMCA - J.CarleySplit 11
L#1 DoublesShane Lefebvre / Amber Hill vs Bernadette DiPino / Richard Lewis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSara Wachs / Charles Klass vs Brita Swanson / James Ray0-1
2021-04-10vs Pelican Bay North - RuffoloLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynn Johns / Tom Powidzki vs Jocelyn Badiu / Greg Strakosch2-6, 3-6
2021-04-03vs Riverstone - P.ChristieLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharles Klass / Sara Wachs vs Terry Dirr / David Townsley7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmber Hill / Tom Powidzki vs Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Roger Paez4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 18 & over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Lynn Johns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Sara Wachs
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Shane Lefebvre
published
3.85
Chris Marchand
published 4
Carole Flegel
published 4
Charles Klass
published 4
3.73
Dan Gustafson
published 4
3.63
Renee Biggam
published
3.53
Amber Hill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Kari Gustafson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Johns
114W–58L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
Sara Wachs
147W–89L career · 4 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
4.16
Shane Lefebvre
14W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Chris Marchand
18W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Carole Flegel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Charles Klass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Dan Gustafson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Renee Biggam
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Amber Hill
79W–160L career · 3 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kari Gustafson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.