Teams

Team 6 Wise Aces

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.39 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Powers / Terry Saeger vs Rob Andreev / Michael Clayton0-6, 3-6
2021-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesTerry Saeger / Chris Powers vs Jack Huang / Ashwin Joshi6-3, 6-1
2021-03-06vs Team 8 District AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Powers / Joseph Jacangelo vs STEPHEN ROMIG / Jeffrey Serbu6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTerry Saeger / Perry Zettersten vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-02-21vs Team 10 Skyline courtmastersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Gordon / Joseph Jacangelo vs Nelson Lobo / Matthew Trimboli7-5, 2-6
2021-02-15vs Team 4Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Jason Olson vs Oron Strauss / Byron Pickard5-7, 5-7
2021-02-08vs Team 3 Lorton LionsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlbert Crenshaw / Perry Zettersten vs Mohit Sehgal / Muthukrishnan Ganesan1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.26
Douglas Thede
published 3.5
JR Carreras
published 3.5
3.20
Doan Nguyen
published 3.5
3.05
Chris Powers
published 3.5
3.03
Joseph Jacangelo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Albert Crenshaw
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Terry Saeger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Andrew Lyons
published 3
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
published
Jason Olson
published
Nabil Ghadiali
published
Perry Zettersten
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Douglas Thede
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
JR Carreras
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Doan Nguyen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Chris Powers
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Joseph Jacangelo
155W–162L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%42%58%
3.03
3.5
Albert Crenshaw
54W–159L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Terry Saeger
77W–96L career · 3 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Andrew Lyons
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
KEVIN CUMMINGS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jason Olson
31W–30L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nabil Ghadiali
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Perry Zettersten
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.