Teams

Monte/Spittle/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women Thursday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women Thursday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Preeti Arla
published
3.26
Claudia Paz
published 3.5
3.12
Erica Stepanishen
published
3.06
Dianne Davenport
published 3.5
2.95
Jessie Seaman
published
2.92
EMILY MARTIN
published
2.90
Olga Spittle
published
2.82
Laura Monesmith
published
2.78
Lore Mandrell
published
2.63
Lesa Monte
published
2.54
Olga Jacobsen
published
Lindsay Norton
published
Ryoko Yamanobe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Seaman + Olga Spittle2551% games+9.7% vs expected
Olga Spittle + Claudia Paz123 matchesnot enough data
Olga Spittle + Lesa Monte123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Preeti Arla
32W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Claudia Paz
25W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Erica Stepanishen
65W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Dianne Davenport
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jessie Seaman
21W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
EMILY MARTIN
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
Olga Spittle
14W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Laura Monesmith
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lore Mandrell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Lesa Monte
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Olga Jacobsen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Lindsay Norton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryoko Yamanobe
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.