Teams

TLSSTEFFEY-Jetton Tri Group B

2024 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-01vs TLLFULLER/SkybrookSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Lia Smith vs Shumbriar Ostapko / Patricia Baldelli6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Annette Mootilal vs Gretchen Earnshaw / Ashley Frisch6-7, 5-7
W#1 DoublesLisa Wilkens / Lia Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShelly Brock / Kristen Frame vs Shelly McCue / Amy Dunn7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-25vs TLJCA-Cassarino/Bailey Rd TRI BLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Lia Smith vs Elana Fedor / Ellyn Pavelka1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMonaliza Onia / Norma Zitnik vs Lisa Alexander / Leenee Roberge3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolli High / Shelly Brock vs Kristin Wilson / Ellen Beltz3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-07-11vs TLKGO-Goodnough/Westport Tri BLost 02
L#1 DoublesSylvia Sullivan / Shelly Steffey vs Elizabeth Krogstie / Becky Heflin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Mootilal / Ursula Kleimeier vs Katelyn Goodnough / Melinda Urban1-6, 1-6
2024-07-03vs TLDStamey/SCC Tri-Level BLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Levy / Heidi Nyquist vs Devon Stamey / Tracie Persinger3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Wilkens / Norma Zitnik vs Andrea Sain / Tiffany Varela3-6, 2-6
2024-06-27vs TLCGR-Griffin/Jetton Tri LevelLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Mootilal / Sylvia Sullivan vs Lauren Hession / Maggie Siebert2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Norma Zitnik vs Karla Williams / Tabitha Elledge0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHeather MacFadyen / Natalie Reid vs Patti Griffin / Danielle Fowler6-3, 7-6
2024-06-20vs TLNKayton/WP TRI BLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Levy / Sylvia Sullivan vs Sunny Donoghue / Emily Heinemann Hamilton6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Steffey / Monaliza Onia vs Nicole Kayton / Rebecca Karner4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Reid / Heather MacFadyen vs Angela Childers / Amy Cullen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-06vs TLFE-Ferren-Marin/Bailey TRI BLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Lisa Wilkens vs Charlene Whichel / Karen Hallman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Levy / Ursula Kleimeier vs Kimberly Benz / Nicole Francomano5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesShelly Brock / Natalie Reid vs Sydney Ferren / Ana Whichel2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Lisa Levy
published
3.23
Shelly Steffey
published
3.23
Sylvia Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Heidi Nyquist
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Ursula Kleimeier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Holli High
published
3.17
Norma Zitnik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Lia Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Heather MacFadyen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Kristen Frame
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Monaliza Onia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.95
Natalie Reid
published
2.64
Shelly Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lisa Wilkens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Nyquist + Heather MacFadyen171254% games+8.1% vs expected
Shelly Brock + Norma Zitnik9652% gamesnot enough data
Norma Zitnik + Heather MacFadyen7649% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Nyquist + Norma Zitnik3642% gamesnot enough data
Norma Zitnik + Ursula Kleimeier4452% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Nyquist + Kristen Frame224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Levy + Ursula Kleimeier033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Levy + Heather MacFadyen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Levy
18W–29L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Shelly Steffey
44W–35L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Sylvia Sullivan
105W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Heidi Nyquist
129W–151L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Ursula Kleimeier
34W–103L career · 2 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Holli High
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Norma Zitnik
131W–136L career · 6 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Lia Smith
67W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Heather MacFadyen
118W–128L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Kristen Frame
78W–72L career · type A · 1 line in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Monaliza Onia
63W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.03
Natalie Reid
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Shelly Brock
86W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.64
Lisa Wilkens
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.