Teams

Slice Girls

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 2.82 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Napier / Elizabeth Schneider vs Brenda Krempaszky / Cynthia Melillo6-4, 6-4
2024-06-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Schneider / Julie Simon vs Judy DeBoer / Cathy Cooper2-6, 3-6
2024-05-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Napier / Julie Simon vs Tundra McDougal / Angela Hill1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Jule Ryan
published 3.5
3.13
Kristina Winterling
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.08
Amy Pugsley
published 3
3.04
Ruth Adler
published 3
2.86
Allison Knight
published 3
2.79
Shawnee Perdue
published 3
2.61
Angela Little
published 2.5
2.50
Cristina Daccarett
published 2.5
2.38
Diana Linderman
published 2.5
2.13
Julie Simon
published 2.5
2.10
Martine Castoro
published 2.5
Elizabeth Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Napier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Linderman + Ruth Adler3446% games+14.2% vs expected
Diana Linderman + Elizabeth Schneider6457% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Elizabeth Schneider2641% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Amy Pugsley3547% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Schneider + Julie Simon0825% gamesnot enough data
Diana Linderman + Amy Pugsley2548% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Adler + Martine Castoro2541% gamesnot enough data
Jule Ryan + Allison Knight6163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jule Ryan
77W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
3.39
3
Kristina Winterling
109W–69L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Amy Pugsley
82W–46L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Ruth Adler
70W–46L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Allison Knight
37W–26L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Shawnee Perdue
26W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
2.5
Angela Little
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%22%78%
2.61
2.5
Cristina Daccarett
27W–28L career · no lines in 2024
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Diana Linderman
38W–48L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Julie Simon
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Martine Castoro
15W–54L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Elizabeth Schneider
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Napier
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.