Teams

Northern/Ostlund/40&Over8.0XD

2025 Mixed 40 & OVER Summer · 8.0 MX (SUN)

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-27vs Smitobol - Mixed 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Twedt / Booshan Bharath vs Julie Bowles / Kris Smitobol1-6, 1-6
2025-07-20vs HANSEN/KVAM - 40'sWon 10
W#3 DoublesKerry Reiling / Doug Roseth vs Tanya Kvam / Ted Stearns6-1, 6-1
2025-07-13vs Kreutzer: South Metro MixedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBooshan Bharath / Sarah Twedt vs Philip Brown / Kara Kreutzer3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPaul Jilek / Kerry Reiling vs Lana Pinnock / Tony Mosser6-4, 6-3
2025-06-15vs Smitobol - Mixed 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Reiling / Doug Roseth vs Julie Bowles / Michael Vecellio6-2, 6-2
2025-06-08vs HANSEN/KVAM - 40'sWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug Roseth / Kerry Reiling vs Tanya Kvam / Kraig Gunwall6-2, 6-2
2025-06-01vs Kreutzer: South Metro MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesBooshan Bharath / Julie Katz vs Joel Haggerty / Lisa Proepper6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (SUN) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Doug Roseth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Leif Johnson
published
3.88
Kerry Reiling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.87
Lynda Stout
published
3.86
Booshan Bharath
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Paul Jilek
published
3.82
Sarah Twedt
published
3.73
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
published
3.61
Kelly Keegan
published
3.57
Per Ostlund
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Twedt + Booshan Bharath6160% games+2.4% vs expected
Leif Johnson + Lynda Stout7452% games+0.3% vs expected
Kelly Keegan + Per Ostlund044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doug Roseth
31W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Leif Johnson
39W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.88
Lynda Stout
55W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Booshan Bharath
176W–107L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Paul Jilek
33W–30L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Sarah Twedt
33W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Alexis Siegel-Carlson
26W–41L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Kelly Keegan
20W–24L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Per Ostlund
14W–42L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.