Teams

BRAMHALL PK 18AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Jiajie Li
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.84
Daniel Kroes
published 4
3.75
Wade Conklin
published
3.75
Harry Wu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
David Loi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Chris Ling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Nan Sun
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Matthew Liem
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Jonathan Wong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Devank Agarwal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Jinhao Li
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Shi Dong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Wei-Cheng Kuo
published
3.33
Eyal Ron
published
3.28
Jingfan Sun
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Kan Yu
published
Ke Lei
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Koki Yoshida
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jingfan Sun + Shi Dong2351% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jiajie Li
11W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Daniel Kroes
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Wade Conklin
20W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
Harry Wu
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
David Loi
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Chris Ling
33W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Nan Sun
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Matthew Liem
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jonathan Wong
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Devank Agarwal
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Jinhao Li
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Shi Dong
36W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Wei-Cheng Kuo
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Eyal Ron
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Jingfan Sun
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kan Yu
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Ke Lei
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Koki Yoshida
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.