Teams

BTA-C RED

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-07vs BCC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesPat Burgener / Polly Rothberg vs Lauren Christin / Petra McDonald1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Brockman / Janice Cook vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-31vs MEA REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesDebby Bell / Ruth Henderson vs Shawna Sharp / Victoria Koury6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKathy Webber / Janice Cook vs Susan Lewis / Jinfang Li0-6, 1-6
2023-05-24vs LTA-P YELLOWWon 20
W#2 DoublesPolly Rothberg / Pat Burgener vs Catherine Romero / Kathleen Sargent1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJanice Cook / Kathy Webber vs Marsha Hansard / Jan DeBruin6-4, 7-5
2023-05-17vs BCC BLUEWon 10
W#2 DoublesPat Burgener / Janice Cook vs Melissa Koller / Katherine Beeck6-2, 6-2
2023-05-10vs MEA REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathy Webber / Ruth Henderson vs Leslie Allen / Diane Bohan4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPat Burgener / Janice Cook vs Teri Jean Fry / Patsy James7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-03vs LTA-P YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuth Henderson / Pat Burgener vs Catherine Romero / Kathleen Sargent2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJanice Cook / Debby Bell vs Michelle Snyder / Marsha Hansard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debby Bell
published 3.5
3.03
Pat Burgener
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.84
Ruth Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Janice Cook
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Polly Rothberg
published
Samantha McBride
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pat Burgener + Ruth Henderson161646% games−12.3% vs expected
Janice Cook + Pat Burgener314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debby Bell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Pat Burgener
67W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Ruth Henderson
70W–114L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Janice Cook
69W–91L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Polly Rothberg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Samantha McBride
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.