Teams

KY/LEX/JONES, D

2026 USTA ADULT 60 & OVER TEAM INVITATIONAL · 3.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-16vs KY/LOU/MARSHWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Kiel / Leigh Shapiro vs Patricia Dye / Amy Lampton6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Boone / Janilyn Bartlett vs Lynn Marple / Karen Embry6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Goss / Ellen Mullarkey vs Elisa Kaufman / Stephanie Samuels6-2, 6-0
2026-05-16vs KY/LOU/MARSHWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Kiel / Leigh Shapiro vs Monica Moman-Saunders / Kathy Klein6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPhylis Pendleton / Janilyn Bartlett vs Fran Ferrell / Janice Hill7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRebecca Goss / Ellen Mullarkey vs Daryl Alfrey / Lisa Marsh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-15vs KY/LOU/MARSHWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeigh Shapiro / Sally Kiel vs Amy Lampton / Fran Ferrell6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaurie Boone / Janilyn Bartlett vs Stephanie Samuels / Elisa Kaufman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRebecca Goss / Phylis Pendleton vs Patricia Dye / Janice Hill6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Rebecca Goss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Phylis Pendleton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Janilyn Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Leigh Shapiro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Sally Kiel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Rhonda Hilton
published
2.65
Denise Jones
published 3
Ellen Mullarkey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laurie Boone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Kiel + Leigh Shapiro4171% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Goss
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Phylis Pendleton
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Janilyn Bartlett
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Leigh Shapiro
13W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Sally Kiel
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Rhonda Hilton
39W–48L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Denise Jones
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Ellen Mullarkey
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laurie Boone
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.