Teams

BC-LLW-MCC/TonyRojko

2023 Adult 40 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
David Chang
published 4
3.98
Steven Anderson
published
3.97
Joe Derhake
published 4.5
3.78
Tony Rojko
published
Cameron Samimi
published 4
Jeffrey Alder
published 4
3.74
3.64
Marc Goedemans
published
3.63
Paul Reiner
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Dean DeVore
published 4
3.62
Steve Shepley
published
3.61
Keith Simpson
published
3.61
Matthew Luce
published
3.61
John Shure
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.56
Matt Witherell
published
3.51
Rick Rumpp
published
Doug Nishida
published
Jeffrey Wahba
published
Mark McColgan
published
Robert Conte
published
Stephen Testa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Reiner + John Shure4846% gamesnot enough data
Paul Reiner + Joe Derhake7358% gamesnot enough data
Paul Reiner + Dean DeVore0643% gamesnot enough data
Paul Reiner + Jeffrey Alder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Chang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
4.24
Steven Anderson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
4.5
Joe Derhake
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.97
Tony Rojko
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.78
4
Cameron Samimi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Jeffrey Alder
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Arsen Harutyunyan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Marc Goedemans
29W–43L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Paul Reiner
93W–90L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
Dean DeVore
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
Steve Shepley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Keith Simpson
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Matthew Luce
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
John Shure
101W–64L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
Matt Witherell
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Rick Rumpp
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Doug Nishida
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Wahba
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark McColgan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Conte
22W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Testa
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.