Teams

Team Parrott

2023 One Doubles - Summer · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-06vs McLaughlin/O'HalloranWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Manke / Jessica Corddry vs Amanda O'Halloran / Chino Mclaughlin6-3, 6-0
2023-07-20vs Neigel-No LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Parrott / Katherine Steuart vs Halie Geier / Victoria Stanton1-6, 1-6
2023-07-20vs Washington AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Parrott / Katherine Steuart vs Karen Fossum / Mollie Gosselin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-07-06vs Chan-Flying EaglesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatherine Steuart / Jessica Corddry vs Diana Chan / Vicki Moll4-6, 4-6
2023-06-28vs SWW-MonsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Parrott / Dana Manke vs Julie Monson / Jessica Riippi2-6, 3-6
2023-06-20vs Mills-WongLost 01
L#1 DoublesLynne Parrott / Katherine Steuart vs Susan Mills / Julie Wong2-6, 2-6
2023-06-15vs Collie/Hall-ASKCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJessica Corddry / Lynne Parrott vs Angela Boice / Shannon Bell-Peterson4-6, 3-6
2023-06-12vs Clarke/Hewitt-Rowley SistersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Corddry / Dana Manke vs Wendy Clarke / Kelly Hewitt6-1, 6-2
2023-06-02vs Tan/Ivester Homes 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Corddry / Dana Manke vs Jennifer Ivester / Mary Sheryll Tan6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SWW-Monson8181269
2Neigel-No Love7272456
3Dizon-Doubles Trouble 2.07272782
4Washington Aces7272771
5McKay5454980
6Phinney's One54541085
7Herrick-Net Nutty54541286
8Slater45451082
9Norris/Lakey45451192
10Tan/Ivester Homes 3.545451188
11Mills-Wong45451194
12Hulburt45451292
13Chan-Flying Eagles45451288
14Shanley45451397
15Team Parrott36361280
16McLaughlin/O'Halloran36361393
17Collie/Hall-ASKC36361389
18Clarke/Hewitt-Rowley Sisters272714100
19Roy-Dare Doubles181816103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Dana Manke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Jessica Corddry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Katherine Steuart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Lynne Parrott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Corddry + Dana Manke331161% games+3.8% vs expected
Lynne Parrott + Dana Manke2547% games+2.2% vs expected
Lynne Parrott + Katherine Steuart2441% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Manke
95W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Jessica Corddry
104W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Katherine Steuart
67W–87L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Lynne Parrott
27W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.