Teams

Toney - Rosemary Beach

2026 OWB TriLevel 18&Over · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garfield - Shalimar Pointe000000
2Toney - Rosemary Beach000000
3Sherrod - Rosemary Beach000000
4Truong-Von Garvisch - Rosemary Beach000000
5Ojdana - Camp Creek000000
6Brandman - Rosemary Beach000000
7Jimison - Edgewater000000
8Butcher - Sandestin000000
9Curtis - Bluewater Bay000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Bobbi Cox
published 4
3.79
Tania Muraro
published
3.77
Jennifer Petersen
published
3.74
Carlye Zaborski
published 4
3.46
Jenny Hudock
published
3.37
Tomasue Weber
published
3.35
Kim Baynes
published
3.32
Lisa Howard
published
Ashley Goyne
published 3.5
3.14
Mendy Melancon
published
2.99
Juju Milam
published
2.91
Janet Guehl
published
2.86
Jodi Pratt
published
Jamie Helms
published
Rebecca Pettet
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bobbi Cox
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Tania Muraro
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Jennifer Petersen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Carlye Zaborski
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Jenny Hudock
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
Tomasue Weber
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Kim Baynes
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Lisa Howard
8W–13L career · no lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Ashley Goyne
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mendy Melancon
11W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Juju Milam
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Janet Guehl
22W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jodi Pratt
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Jamie Helms
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebecca Pettet
13W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.