Teams

Sherrod - Rosemary Beach

2026 OWB TriLevel 18&Over · 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Garfield - Shalimar Pointe000000
2Toney - Rosemary Beach000000
3Sherrod - Rosemary Beach000000
4Truong-Von Garvisch - Rosemary Beach000000
5Ojdana - Camp Creek000000
6Brandman - Rosemary Beach000000
7Jimison - Edgewater000000
8Butcher - Sandestin000000
9Curtis - Bluewater Bay000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Johnson
published 4
3.51
Patricia Sherrod
published
3.33
Sherry Dennis
published
3.26
Sandra Read
published
3.24
Pamm Chapman
published
3.08
3.01
Deanna Young
published 3
2.93
Yana Morgan
published
2.91
Nicole Rogers
published
Emily King
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Southerland + Nicole Rogers224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Johnson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Sherrod
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Sherry Dennis
46W–59L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.33
Sandra Read
85W–51L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Pamm Chapman
2W–6L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Carol Southerland
19W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Deanna Young
17W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Yana Morgan
15W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Nicole Rogers
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Emily King
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.