Teams

PTSA 4.5

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-05-23vs UP THE CREEKLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Diehr / Heather Rice vs Jeanie Wahl / Jody Mallane6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristine Reeds / Becky Caven vs Dana Gross / Dana Rosellini1-6, 5-7
2022-05-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Rice / Kristen Jacobs vs Meg Markley / Wendy Klein6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Hardy / Christine Reeds vs Ashley Tribble / Joanne Cornwell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-05-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Baran / Heather Rice vs Meg Markley / Susan Schossberger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-12vs 80's LadiesLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Caven / Christine Reeds vs Kerri Porritt / Bobette Wood2-6, 6-7
2022-05-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Diehr / Heather Rice vs Lisa Hulsman / Jenny Grunke6-1, 6-3
2022-05-04Split 11
W#2 DoublesBecky Goodwin / Christine Reeds vs Dana Rosellini / Karri Jones6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBecky Caven / Heather Rice vs Christina Questad / Leslie Phillips2-6, 4-6
2022-04-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesBecky Caven / Christine Reeds vs Robyn Roby / Kelly Sturdy6-1, 6-2
2022-04-25vs 80's LadiesWon 20
W#1 SinglesHeather Rice vs Halle Alexander1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Goodwin / Christine Reeds vs Diana Gastanaga / Lisa Sliger6-4, 6-4
2022-04-20vs Love Me Some TennisLost 01
L#1 SinglesHeather Rice vs Denise Schwendener1-6, 2-6
2022-04-18vs UP THE CREEKLost 01
L#3 DoublesBecky Caven / Christine Reeds vs Clarissa Cutler-Evans / Dana Rosellini4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-04-06vs 80's LadiesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Diehr / Heather Rice vs Lisa Sliger / Shelley Ware1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanna Murali / Christine Reeds vs Rachel Kincheloe / Becca Longson6-7, 3-6
2022-04-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Rice / Jessica Jensen vs Kathy Adamson / Maria Turner6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
180's Ladies111361228315
2UP THE CREEK93311741360
3PTSA 4.575222658441
4Love Me Some Tennis39232555440
5Klein01284084537

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Reeds
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.03
Kayce McEwan
published 4
3.97
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.92
Jessica Jensen
published
3.87
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.86
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.81
Lisa Diehr
published 4
3.77
Nicole Hancock
published 4
Heather Rice
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 4
3.69
Suzanne Baran
published 4
3.62
Becky Caven
published 4
3.53
Karen Mangum
published 4
3.43
Terry Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.25
Denise Shawver
published 3.5
Becky Goodwin
published
Lisa Stimpson
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Wendy Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanna Murali + Beth Calvo14657% games+4.5% vs expected
Lisa Diehr + Jessica Jensen8552% games+3.1% vs expected
Kristen Jacobs + Beth Calvo11555% games+2.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Becky Caven471958% games+2.1% vs expected
Lisa Diehr + Becky Caven6852% games+1.9% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Kayce McEwan91248% games−0.2% vs expected
Denise Shawver + Beth Calvo513554% games−0.7% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Suzanna Murali111149% games−1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christine Reeds
43W–31L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kayce McEwan
147W–64L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Kristen Jacobs
212W–92L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
Jessica Jensen
84W–78L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.92
4
Suzanna Murali
297W–165L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Beth Calvo
172W–128L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Lisa Diehr
92W–87L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Heather Rice
16W–18L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Becky Caven
228W–146L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Karen Mangum
72W–60L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Terry Hardy
212W–302L career · 9 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Denise Shawver
70W–72L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Becky Goodwin
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Stimpson
24W–14L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Anderson
58W–50L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.