Teams

Klein

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.91 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
180's Ladies111361228315
2UP THE CREEK93311741360
3PTSA 4.575222658441
4Love Me Some Tennis39232555440
5Klein01284084537

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Ashley Tribble
published 4
3.86
Kathy Scribner
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.76
Connie Bartich
published 4
3.74
Joanne Cornwell
published 4
3.70
3.68
Jeanna Rice
published 4
3.66
Kelly Sturdy
published 4
3.62
Adriana Kurtz
published 4
3.46
Trang Pham
published 3.5
3.27
Janet Wilson
published 3.5
Kaycie Roberts
published
Meg Markley
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Pamela Fields
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Schossberger
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Wendy Klein
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Christensen + Janet Wilson624154% games+2.4% vs expected
Pamela Fields + Adriana Kurtz726851% gamesnot enough data
Wendy Klein + Trang Pham8450% gamesnot enough data
Meg Markley + Susan Schossberger4845% gamesnot enough data
Meg Markley + Kelly Sturdy2834% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Fields + Robyn Roby2447% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Tribble + Kaycie Roberts0629% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Roby + Susan Schossberger4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Tribble
183W–147L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Kathy Scribner
97W–56L career · 15 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Robyn Roby
394W–189L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Connie Bartich
94W–46L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Joanne Cornwell
175W–140L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kathy Christensen
95W–68L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Jeanna Rice
126W–91L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Kelly Sturdy
93W–90L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Adriana Kurtz
81W–65L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Trang Pham
148W–124L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Janet Wilson
151W–129L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Kaycie Roberts
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meg Markley
36W–68L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Fields
68W–67L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Schossberger
15W–20L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Klein
15W–76L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.