Teams

Cady

2023 Frederick Adult 18 & Over · Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-19vs FowleWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Mahaney / Byron Levy vs Robert Weaver / Joseph D'Agrosa6-3, 6-0
2023-06-18vs FowleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGregory Selby / Michael Mahaney vs Steve Maleson / Jeffrey Fowle4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesByron Levy / Daniel Park vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-15vs FowleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGregory Selby / Luis Lozano vs Steve Maleson / Jeff Manwiller6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Smoot / Henry Cha vs Peter Bonbrest / Robert Weaver7-6, 6-1
2023-06-11vs FowleWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Dessel / Gregory Selby vs Steve Maleson / Shawn Peffall6-1, 6-1
2023-05-31vs FowleWon 10
W#2 DoublesJustin Cady / James Smoot vs Peter Bonbrest / Joseph D'Agrosa3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-18vs FowleWon 10
W#2 DoublesDoug DeLawter / Wornden Ly vs Robert Weaver / Shawn Peffall6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-15vs FowleWon 10
W#1 DoublesDoug DeLawter / Steve French vs Jeff Manwiller / Paul Levine2-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Michael Mahaney
published 4.5
4.39
James Smoot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Luis Lozano
published
4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.31
Steve French
published
4.20
Gregory Selby
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Byron Levy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.08
Doug DeLawter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.94
Henry Cha
published
3.75
Justin Cady
published
3.38
John Shin
published
Stephen Dessel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug DeLawter + James Smoot3443% gamesnot enough data
James Smoot + Gregory Selby2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michael Mahaney
81W–55L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
James Smoot
262W–225L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
4.39
Luis Lozano
67W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
4.39
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.36
Steve French
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Gregory Selby
56W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Byron Levy
144W–118L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Doug DeLawter
208W–136L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
4.08
Henry Cha
25W–47L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.94
Justin Cady
27W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
John Shin
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Stephen Dessel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.