Teams

IAWC/Buck-Fisher/55&Over8.0M

2026 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 8.0 M 55 Over

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-03vs Carlyle/MillerWon 21
L#1 DoublesScott Neely / Anil Jha vs Eric Eide / Chuck Winkleblack3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Matthew Bright vs Dale Smith / David Carlyle6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDennis Lonzarich / Joel Sissel vs Ronald Miller / Alejandro Andreotti6-4, 6-1
2026-02-01vs HeilWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Whipps / David Olsgaard vs David Brick / Richard Heil6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStu Card / Michael Bohnenkamp vs Matthew Morgan / Kevin Baeth6-7, 0-2
W#3 DoublesAnil Jha / Keith Buck vs Cliff Stroh / Ronald Bradfield6-2, 6-0
2026-01-18vs Carlyle/MillerWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnil Jha / Michael Bohnenkamp vs William (Ev) Cochrane / Eric Bligard5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMartin Fisher Jr / Stu Card vs Chuck Winkleblack / Dale Smith7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Bright / Keith Buck vs David Carlyle / Alejandro Andreotti6-0, 6-3
2025-12-14vs HeilSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnil Jha / Stu Card vs Richard Heil / Joel Nikolas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Olsgaard / Michael Bohnenkamp vs Ronald Bradfield / Matthew Morgan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-10-26vs Carlyle/MillerWon 21
L#1 DoublesStu Card / Anil Jha vs William (Ev) Cochrane / Chuck Winkleblack4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesScott Neely / Keith Buck vs Eric Eide / David Carlyle6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Arthur Khaw vs Ronald Miller / Thomas Nordhoff7-5, 6-3
2025-09-14vs HeilWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Bohnenkamp / Scott Neely vs Ron Shortenhaus / Joel Nikolas6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMartin Fisher Jr / Joel Sissel vs Matthew Morgan / Ronald Bradfield4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Bright / Arthur Khaw vs Peter Else / Cliff Stroh6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 M 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M60153896
2IAWC/Buck-Fisher/55&Over8.0M6013513135
3Heil2481025184
4Childers1561226187
5Carlyle/Miller1561227198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Arthur Khaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Scott Neely
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Anil Jha
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.60
David Olsgaard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Dennis Lonzarich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Michael Bohnenkamp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Matthew Bright
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Stu Card
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Martin Fisher Jr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Matthew Whipps
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Joel Sissel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Keith Buck
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Whipps + David Olsgaard4153% games+10.3% vs expected
Stu Card + Anil Jha2442% games−8.0% vs expected
David Olsgaard + Keith Buck5159% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bohnenkamp + Keith Buck1444% gamesnot enough data
Michael Bohnenkamp + Stu Card224 matchesnot enough data
Stu Card + Martin Fisher Jr314 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Bright + Matthew Whipps224 matchesnot enough data
Anil Jha + Martin Fisher Jr314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arthur Khaw
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Neely
30W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Anil Jha
49W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
4
David Olsgaard
18W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Dennis Lonzarich
19W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Michael Bohnenkamp
20W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Matthew Bright
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Stu Card
60W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Martin Fisher Jr
47W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Matthew Whipps
64W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Joel Sissel
27W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Buck
25W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.