Teams

HG Power Players - A. McKenna

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Jolanta Lagowski vs Anne Marie Lennox / Johnessa Hern3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesQuinn Bursack / Pamela Gonzalez vs Heidi Pogue / DIANA POSADA1-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesRoseann McNichol / Jolanta Lagowski vs Amy Corcell / Jessica Dolcimascolo2-6, 2-6
2021-11-01vs Cheval - B. BurdetteSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLisa Marinez vs Joanne Urban1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Jolanta Lagowski vs Dawn Kay / Cheryl Bell6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-10-18vs FH Matchmakers - D. LinthicumLost 01
L#1 DoublesDelores Hall / Lisa Marinez vs Melissa Sparks / Kayla Loede3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Rairigh / Paula Link vs Carmen Heggen / Ellen Henne6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLisa Marinez vs Tina Sturdevant0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Gonzalez / Anne McKenna vs Carrie Bradley / Catherine Hoyord2-6, 2-6
2021-10-04vs TYCC - M. GarciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Lenaghan / Jolanta Lagowski vs Leigh Gardner / Michele Milazzo4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Marinez vs Jessica Eggleston0-6, 0-6
2021-09-27vs Arbor Greene - C. Van MeterLost 02
L#1 SinglesLisa Marinez vs Celeste Kallenborn1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnne McKenna / Jolanta Lagowski vs Courtney Craig / Jiyoung Yoon0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne McKenna / Amy Rairigh vs Kim Lafferty / Susan Rind6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Sparks / Lisa Marinez vs Dianna Lott / Tyra Hunt1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Paula Link
published
2.99
Megan Brooks
published
2.90
Lisa Marinez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Amy Rairigh
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Colleen Lenaghan
published 3
2.66
Risa Blake
published
2.57
Jihea Helme
published
2.55
Roseann McNichol
published
2.41
Pamela Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Anne McKenna
published 3
2.23
Cindy Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jolanta Lagowski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Marinez + Colleen Lenaghan6547% games−7.1% vs expected
Amy Rairigh + Jolanta Lagowski3545% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Sparks + Pamela Gonzalez1543% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Jolanta Lagowski2446% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Sparks + Lisa Marinez123 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Gonzalez + Amy Rairigh033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Link
39W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.10
Megan Brooks
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Lisa Marinez
122W–115L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Amy Rairigh
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Colleen Lenaghan
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Risa Blake
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Jihea Helme
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Roseann McNichol
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Pamela Gonzalez
26W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
3
Anne McKenna
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
2.33
2.5
Cindy Sparks
48W–86L career · 1 line in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23
Jolanta Lagowski
45W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kasia Dolinska-Timoszuk
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.