Teams

GSTL18/Heinemann/Stables

2024 Tri Level 18 & Over · 2.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-19vs GSTL18/Elswick/RLTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDani Ryalls / Gillian Barry vs Liza Lucky / Timmeri Massey6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Heinemann / Annie Williams vs Toni Fillmore / Karen Bellamy5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTara Crammer / Amanda Davis vs Olivia Elswick / Amy Canavan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-06vs GSTL18/Elswick/RLTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDani Ryalls / Gillian Barry vs Terri Brobst / Jennifer Phillips6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Fitchett / Lauren Dieter vs Kristy Stocks / Toni Fillmore5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMeredith Monroe / Kelly Cox vs Sarah LaPerle / Amanda Hadstate0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Tara Crammer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Polly McCray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Gillian Barry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Glenn Wilcox
published
3.00
Meredith Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Tyler Easterling
published
2.91
2.85
Austyn Smith
published 3
2.85
Tracy Heinemann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Kelly Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alexis Cook
published 3
Dani Ryalls
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Lauren Dieter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Martha Fitchett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Alison Pavy
published 3
Margaret McGill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Crammer + Gillian Barry224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Dieter + Tracy Heinemann314 matchesnot enough data
Glenn Wilcox + Tracy Heinemann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara Crammer
31W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.16
Polly McCray
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Gillian Barry
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
Glenn Wilcox
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Meredith Monroe
24W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Tyler Easterling
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Kimberly Leatherwood
5W–13L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.91
3
Austyn Smith
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Tracy Heinemann
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
Kelly Cox
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Alexis Cook
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dani Ryalls
2W–0L career · type T · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Dieter
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Martha Fitchett
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.49
3
Alison Pavy
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46
Margaret McGill
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.