Teams

GSTL18/Elswick/RLTC

2024 Tri Level 18 & Over · 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-26vs GSTL18/Oakley/GrandeDunesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Canavan / Olivia Elswick vs Debbie Michnowicz / Donna Calder6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesToni Fillmore / Lisa Leroux vs Lisa Austin / Carollee Gunnarson6-2, 7-6
2024-11-19vs GSTL18/Heinemann/StablesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLiza Lucky / Timmeri Massey vs Dani Ryalls / Gillian Barry0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesToni Fillmore / Karen Bellamy vs Tracy Heinemann / Annie Williams7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesOlivia Elswick / Amy Canavan vs Tara Crammer / Amanda Davis5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-06vs GSTL18/Heinemann/StablesLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Brobst / Jennifer Phillips vs Dani Ryalls / Gillian Barry0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKristy Stocks / Toni Fillmore vs Martha Fitchett / Lauren Dieter7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah LaPerle / Amanda Hadstate vs Meredith Monroe / Kelly Cox6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Sarah LaPerle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kristy Stocks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Amanda Hadstate
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Olivia Elswick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Amy Canavan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Lisa Leroux
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Toni Fillmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Karen Bellamy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Timmeri Massey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Liza Lucky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terri Brobst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Canavan + Olivia Elswick3251% gamesnot enough data
Karen Bellamy + Lisa Leroux303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah LaPerle
29W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kristy Stocks
28W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Amanda Hadstate
20W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
Olivia Elswick
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Amy Canavan
31W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lisa Leroux
38W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Toni Fillmore
58W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Karen Bellamy
28W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Timmeri Massey
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
Liza Lucky
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Terri Brobst
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.