Teams

GSTL18/Oakley/GrandeDunes

2024 Tri Level 18 & Over · 2.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.19 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-26vs GSTL18/Elswick/RLTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Michnowicz / Donna Calder vs Amy Canavan / Olivia Elswick2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Austin / Carollee Gunnarson vs Toni Fillmore / Lisa Leroux2-6, 6-7
2024-11-12vs GSTL18/Heinemann/StablesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeanne Johnson Stephens / Diana Morgan vs Glenn Wilcox / Tyler Easterling6-4, 6-1
2024-11-05vs GSTL18/Elswick/RLTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Thomas / Diana Morgan vs Lisa Leroux / Amanda Hadstate3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Sandra Valentine
published
3.06
Diana Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Debbie Michnowicz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Sarah Kirit
published
2.79
Jeanne Bennett
published
2.78
Donna Calder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Alison Roark
published 3
Carollee Gunnarson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christian Reed
published 3
2.71
Dayle Oakley
published 3
2.50
Lorraine Pepe
published
2.32
Stephanie Warren
published
Deena Pagliaro
published 2.5
2.10
Meredith Lukowski
published
1.96
Jenifer Armeen
published
Robyn O'Hara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Kirit + Lorraine Pepe7354% games+13.4% vs expected
Jenifer Armeen + Stephanie Warren213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
Sandra Valentine
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Debbie Michnowicz
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96
Sarah Kirit
31W–23L career · no lines in 2024
0%2%98%
2.80
Jeanne Bennett
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Donna Calder
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alison Roark
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Carollee Gunnarson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Christian Reed
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dayle Oakley
12W–20L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Lorraine Pepe
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%51%49%
2.50
Stephanie Warren
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Deena Pagliaro
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Lukowski
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jenifer Armeen
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Robyn O'Hara
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.