Teams

MC GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-02vs BP REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky Lowery / Kirsten Sharer vs Angela Martin / Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnnmarie Oien vs Mandy Staehler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Conti / Amanda Mayock vs Ashley Lougheed / Meredith Barnes6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-26vs NJ PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Mayock / Elizabeth Conti vs Rachel Eng / Jennifer Davis1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Greiner / Annmarie Oien vs Laura Garrido / Christine Loehr4-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs RHCC YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Amanda Mayock vs Tori Schultz / Tiffany Skiles6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElisabeth Bush / Jackie Greiner vs Cheryl Crawford / Nicolle McKinney6-7, 4-6
2024-08-12vs MVCC YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Becky Lowery vs Beth Eiseman / Stephanie Whitman3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Bush / Amanda Mayock vs Lori Clark / Debra O'Donnell6-3, 6-1
2024-08-05vs NJ REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesBecky Lowery / Kirsten Sharer vs Deena Green / Ingrid Palmer7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJackie Greiner / Amanda Mayock vs Mary Elizabeth Frederick / Daryna Piria7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-30vs BP REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesBecky Lowery / Annmarie Oien vs Angela Martin / Kelly Zander6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Conti / Kirsten Sharer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-22vs NJ PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Oien / Becky Lowery vs Rachel Eng / Christine Loehr4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKirsten Sharer / Elizabeth Conti vs Laura Kelly / Susan Tomlinson0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Amanda Mayock
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Annmarie Oien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Becky Lowery
published 3
2.69
Kirsten Sharer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Jackie Greiner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elisabeth Bush
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Greiner + Amanda Mayock5351% games+3.1% vs expected
Kirsten Sharer + Annmarie Oien134 matchesnot enough data
Jackie Greiner + Annmarie Oien044 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Sharer + Jackie Greiner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Mayock
18W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Annmarie Oien
21W–38L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Becky Lowery
6W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Kirsten Sharer
48W–85L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Jackie Greiner
48W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Elisabeth Bush
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.