Teams

DTC #2

2023 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 2.5 WOMEN - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-05-31vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Judy Myers vs Margaret Bruno / Addy Iveth Zilberman7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesChar Williams / Roslyn Katz vs Crystal Ziebarth / Christie Sanders1-6, 2-6
2023-05-24vs STIRLING CLUBLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Rachel Glaze vs Jolene Mannina / Guadalupe Sherman2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mortensen vs Karen Veazey6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGina Alcoser / Judy Myers vs Stephanie Stephen / Arlene Joyner-Tucker6-0, 6-0
2023-05-17vs DTC #1Won 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Myers / Gina Alcoser vs Maria Zoine / Lia Su6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKimberly Cunningham vs Geraldine Davis3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTina Shirey / Char Williams vs Barb Stanley / Catherine Cummins7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-10vs TPCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Judy Myers vs Katrina Braman / Melissa Puopolo3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Glaze vs Dulcinea Rongavilla6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRoslyn Katz / Char Williams vs Lani Wong / Chelsey Queeley2-6, 1-6
2023-05-03vs SPANISH TRAILLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Judy Myers vs Pam Birnbaum / Julie Brown1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mortensen vs Hollie Millican4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Rachel Glaze vs Alexandria Chang / Heather Hartzell6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-26vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Judy Myers vs Courtney Long / Kellye Ray6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRachel Glaze vs Golssa Moridi6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRoslyn Katz / Tina Shirey vs Raedene Counts / Jamie Sabet3-6, 0-6
2023-04-19vs NV/WITCHER/ADULT18&OVER/W2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Rachel Glaze vs Heather DeMasi / Christine Marshall4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Mortensen vs Roxanne Villalba0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Cunningham / Tina Shirey vs Yong Mi DeMilliano / Shannon Wynn6-3, 6-1
2023-04-14vs STIRLING CLUBLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Tina Shirey vs Shan Bates / Debra Kelleher6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Mortensen vs Jolene Mannina7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChar Williams / Roslyn Katz vs Arlene Joyner-Tucker / Michele Premone6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-03-30vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 12
W#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Judy Myers vs Crystal Ziebarth / Vicky Huangfu3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKimberly Cunningham vs Gretchen Wills4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRoslyn Katz / Char Williams vs Shaza Nayef / Ashley Richas1-6, 0-6
2023-03-22vs DTC #1Won 21
W#1 DoublesGina Alcoser / Judy Myers vs Geraldine Davis / Supriya Prasad3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRoslyn Katz vs Shawn McNulty1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Glaze / Kimberly Cunningham vs Jodie Mandel / Barb Stanley6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Tina Shirey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Gina Alcoser
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.44
Roslyn Katz
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.38
Michelle Mortensen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Char Williams
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Judy Myers
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Kimberly Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Rachel Glaze
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Souphaphone Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Alcoser + Judy Myers6160% games+4.7% vs expected
Kimberly Cunningham + Tina Shirey3545% games−3.6% vs expected
Char Williams + Roslyn Katz044 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Glaze + Kimberly Cunningham224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tina Shirey
112W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Gina Alcoser
56W–42L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
2.5
Roslyn Katz
68W–113L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%67%33%
2.44
Michelle Mortensen
26W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Char Williams
18W–64L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judy Myers
11W–15L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Cunningham
24W–50L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Glaze
61W–46L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Souphaphone Stewart
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.