Teams

VAMOS

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs Mixed TroubleLost 12
L#1 DoublesTed Wagner / Gabrielle Bohdel vs Jen Hunter / Alex Coronado4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAnthony Tomyn / Kristina Winterling vs Alaina Sayers / Andy Mehl6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLee Parsons / Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin vs Valerie Brauner / Adam Richins5-7, 3-6
2026-08-25vs Dirty DeuceWon 21
L#1 DoublesSonia Ivanova / Ralph Rico vs Peter Giordano / Carrie Fischer2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlice Livesay / Patrik Martinet vs Peter Mahoney / Bridget Mahoney7-5, 4-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Francel / Chris Proctor vs Brent Galvan / Jennifer Galvan6-3, 6-3
2026-08-20vs The Slice is RightWon 30
W#1 DoublesTed Wagner / Gabrielle Bohdel vs Erica Gonzalez / Tuo Shi6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSonia Ivanova / Ralph Rico vs Stacy Wayman / Lucas Wayman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Tomyn / Kristina Winterling vs Eduardo Vergara / Carmen Pia Bosse6-1, 6-4
2026-08-13vs Service AnimalsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Francel / Chris Proctor vs Scott Carlisle / Ellen Kennedy7-5, 6-1
2026-08-11vs Mix N MatchWon 10
W#3 DoublesChris Proctor / Michelle Francel vs Gillian Donahey / Jeremy Glassco6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Awesome1021222
2Service Animals1021327
3Dirty Deuce1142432
4Mix N Match1142450
5VAMOS1133758
6Going Places1124861
7The Slice is Right02151066

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Chris Proctor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Ted Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Sonia Ivanova
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Anthony Tomyn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Alice Livesay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lee Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.13
Kristina Winterling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.06
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Patrik Martinet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Tony Auston
published 3
2.97
Ralph Rico
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Gabrielle Bohdel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Ogorman
published
Michelle Francel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabrielle Bohdel + Anthony Tomyn4256% games+7.6% vs expected
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin + Ted Wagner7255% games−1.1% vs expected
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin + Patrik Martinet4352% gamesnot enough data
Anthony Tomyn + Kristina Winterling2345% gamesnot enough data
Gabrielle Bohdel + Patrik Martinet224 matchesnot enough data
Chris Proctor + Michelle Francel303 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin + Tony Auston303 matchesnot enough data
Alice Livesay + Patrik Martinet303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Proctor
3W–0L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.76
3.5
Ted Wagner
80W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Sonia Ivanova
102W–91L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Anthony Tomyn
49W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Alice Livesay
109W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Lee Parsons
62W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.24
3
Kristina Winterling
109W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Wendy Bee Ping Ong Mullin
63W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Patrik Martinet
112W–104L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Tony Auston
71W–79L career · no lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Ralph Rico
39W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Gabrielle Bohdel
50W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katie Ogorman
12W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Francel
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.