Teams

Koch Summer

2022 ADULT 40 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Dominique Allex
published 4
3.46
Sarah Tuel
published
3.46
Connie Weinstein
published 3.5
3.46
Barb Brown
published 3.5
3.37
Kristin Lambrecht
published
3.35
Brigitte Schiller
published 3.5
3.32
Karen Galvin
published
3.31
Nancy Paulson
published
3.21
Amy Haugen
published 3.5
3.21
Chris Ablack
published 3.5
3.16
Deborah Zilverberg
published 3.5
3.11
Nancy Koch
published
3.07
Kathy Burns
published
2.99
Debbie Conley
published 3.5
2.80
Yelena Yan
published
2.78
Beth Nesheim
published 3
Kathleen Kennedy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Nesheim + Deborah Zilverberg3447% games−1.5% vs expected
Kristin Lambrecht + Brigitte Schiller303 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Burns + Barb Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Connie Weinstein + Brigitte Schiller303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dominique Allex
25W–17L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Sarah Tuel
75W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Connie Weinstein
29W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Barb Brown
40W–27L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kristin Lambrecht
43W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Brigitte Schiller
34W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Karen Galvin
12W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Nancy Paulson
106W–78L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Amy Haugen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Chris Ablack
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Deborah Zilverberg
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Nancy Koch
37W–41L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kathy Burns
20W–24L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Debbie Conley
1W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Beth Nesheim
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Kathleen Kennedy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.