Teams

CDTA S 55&O 9.0W Deer Creek Taylor Tues 10 $5

CDTA Summer Adult 55 & Over WD · CDTA 55&O W 9.0 Summer

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesDonna Chudacoff / Michelle Granger vs Kim Rust / Laura Ulrich6-0, 7-5
L#1 DoublesJudith Bavlsik / Carolyn Sitkiewicz vs Lisa Musgrave / Laura Ulrich2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Granger / Sarah Koloms vs Barb Bevenour / Julie Stahl6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDonna Chudacoff / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Kim Rust / Noreen Ohcana6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesIrina Dobin / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Roberta Louis Goodman / Lisa Musgrave6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDawn Moller / Carolyn Sitkiewicz vs Barb Bevenour / Julie Stahl3-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesJudith Bavlsik / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Noreen Ohcana / Laura Ulrich3-6, 5-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesIrina Dobin / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Lisa Musgrave / Roberta Louis Goodman6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesIrina Dobin / Priscilla Ewaldz vs Lisa Musgrave / Roberta Louis Goodman6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Koloms / Carolyn Sitkiewicz vs Barb Bevenour / Julie Stahl4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Granger / Linda Traeger vs Kim Rust / Laura Ulrich6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CDTA 55&O W 9.0 Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Irina Dobin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
3.70
Priscilla Ewaldz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
Carolyn Sitkiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Granger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Ewaldz + Irina Dobin16362% games+5.2% vs expected
Priscilla Ewaldz + Michelle Granger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Irina Dobin
94W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.63
4
Priscilla Ewaldz
145W–184L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Carolyn Sitkiewicz
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Granger
23W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.